Not relevant to mask wearing at all....are you assuming that you can create a “disability” for yourself so you legally do not have to wear a mask or am I missing the point? I am not a shill but I am starting to be a little objective to some of this far reaching irrelevant data
How so? Have there been any presidencies set in court yet? Believing they would or would not apply is simply opinion at this point. While I’m not agreeing or disagreeing I can factually say that many box stores have pulled back the idea of enforcement based on the religious rights idea. They know that in many areas “social stigma” will police many, but also realize that they have to stay neutral when challenged for fear of potential suit and vulnerability.
Not relevant to mask wearing at all....are you assuming that you can create a “disability” for yourself so you legally do not have to wear a mask or am I missing the point? I am not a shill but I am starting to be a little objective to some of this far reaching irrelevant data
How so? Have there been any presidencies set in court yet? Believing they would or would not apply is simply opinion at this point. While I’m not agreeing or disagreeing I can factually say that many box stores have pulled back the idea of enforcement based on the religious rights idea. They know that in many areas “social stigma” will police many, but also realize that they have to stay neutral when challenged for fear of potential suit and vulnerability.
I agree....again this was needed in the original post, good rebuttal