Catherine herridge - Jan 22nd - "follow the pen" #4423 - Grassley?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (23)
sorted by:
I've been thinking about these Herridge posts, and while I can't say I've decoded anything in the text of the documents, I do watch the pen. And I've noticed something: the actual pens & highlighters she shows in the photo(s) sometimes aligns with what she's used on the page. But not always. For example: this document. She used a blue ink pen (shown) and a yellow highlighter (not shown). She did not appear to use the black ink pen, which IS shown. Why does she do this? I have to think it means something, some kind of comms. But I haven't figured it out. Fellow Pedes, what do you think? Have any of you noticed this, too?
yeah I posted this because I just saw a post for Grassley a minute ago, but I did remember this drop for some reason.
But black ink is used, by Grassley.
Does blue and black ink have meaning in the journalistic world when making notes or edits? Sort of an example: MTK means More to Come (journalism) MTK is used by writers when more information is need. It’s a placeholder to make it easier to “circle around” (to borrow a phrase) to later get the needed information to add into their writing. Maybe the two different inks have some type of function with the notes.
Well there's the generic of blue ink being more secure as it's more likely to be original ink. Its easier to fake black because it can be devoid of color gradient and look like black ink
I'm going to have to go back and see if I can find more examples (have any Herridge fans out there already put together a compilation?) but it's not just black and/or blue ink pens that make an appearance. I could have sworn I saw one that featured a pink highlighter, but had nothing highlighted in pink on the document. 'Tis strange, no?