Let me play a bit of devil's advocate here. I actually don't think he handled himself that well. The gaslighting media whore talking head deserved a huge beatdown, but what he did in response to her was too full of emotion. The key right now is to redpill normies with a digestable set of facts that support the pro-Trump narrative, not to get everyone on here (or any of the other various pro-Trump sites) fired up with a single mic drop moment. I'm sure of course that he's upset at his home being attacked...on top of all the BS that we all see in our country today...but we need tactically calm and heavy-hitting leadership right now, not raw emotion. I don't know that this behavior is what the normies need to see to get them on our side.
That was not raw emotion. That was raw honesty. That was him choosing to be completely honest with himself and hence others. He didn't give a damn about optics because that's not what he wanted to partake in, and that genuineness is what is lacking in the rigid rules of "presentable TV".
I am sure that most people would rather see raw honesty than the dull facade that you're pressured to show on public TV.
I would counter that the "most people" you are talking about are the ones that are already redpilled and on our side. The "most people" that I'm talking about are the ones that aren't hardcore Lefty or evil but just haven't been awakened yet. For these folks, style matters as much or if not more than substance. You and I care more about substance, which is why we've already been redpilled and why we supported Trump.
I'm not saying not to fight back with honesty and the truth...that's really the only thing we SHOULD fight back with in terms of content of the argument. Pointing out when the Left isn't using honesty and truth is key. But considering that we're in the persuasion part of the Great Awakening, style does matter as much as truth in order to bring more folks into the light.
That is the worst possible cliche to use.
It is not one a wise man would use.
If you had a differing point of view
Simply state it.
No need to identify yourself as satan's lawyer.
Come on man... Think.
Let me play a bit of devil's advocate here. I actually don't think he handled himself that well. The gaslighting media whore talking head deserved a huge beatdown, but what he did in response to her was too full of emotion. The key right now is to redpill normies with a digestable set of facts that support the pro-Trump narrative, not to get everyone on here (or any of the other various pro-Trump sites) fired up with a single mic drop moment. I'm sure of course that he's upset at his home being attacked...on top of all the BS that we all see in our country today...but we need tactically calm and heavy-hitting leadership right now, not raw emotion. I don't know that this behavior is what the normies need to see to get them on our side.
That was not raw emotion. That was raw honesty. That was him choosing to be completely honest with himself and hence others. He didn't give a damn about optics because that's not what he wanted to partake in, and that genuineness is what is lacking in the rigid rules of "presentable TV".
I am sure that most people would rather see raw honesty than the dull facade that you're pressured to show on public TV.
I would counter that the "most people" you are talking about are the ones that are already redpilled and on our side. The "most people" that I'm talking about are the ones that aren't hardcore Lefty or evil but just haven't been awakened yet. For these folks, style matters as much or if not more than substance. You and I care more about substance, which is why we've already been redpilled and why we supported Trump.
I'm not saying not to fight back with honesty and the truth...that's really the only thing we SHOULD fight back with in terms of content of the argument. Pointing out when the Left isn't using honesty and truth is key. But considering that we're in the persuasion part of the Great Awakening, style does matter as much as truth in order to bring more folks into the light.
It is not wise to advocate for the Lord's enemies.
It's a figure of speech. I'm not literally advocating for Satan.
For Pete's sake...
That is the worst possible cliche to use. It is not one a wise man would use. If you had a differing point of view Simply state it. No need to identify yourself as satan's lawyer. Come on man... Think.