This sounds about right to me and how I’ve always viewed him. I always said that Jones has spoken the truth on a lot of things but he mixes in the batshit insane stuff too. almost like a cover. Like he can say the batshit insane true things but because he ranted about frogs being turned gay, it makes the rest of what he says look ridiculous. “Oh that’s the frogs are gay guy? Don’t believe a word of what he says.”
Remember when he started getting too into the truth and they threatened his family and he kinda simmered down? Yeah.
Maybe "forced transitioning" or "feminizing males" is a better phrase. But there really is a chemical shown to feminize frogs (and others) that is found in certain areas' drinking water. In my opinion with the intention to feminize men.
AJ has a lot of retarded redneck followers (I say that as a florida born and raised "redneck") that don't understand how to make sense of hyperbole. And so they go around announcing verbatim that frogs are literally turning gay to all the normies. Normies in turn use google to fact check and see that "factcheck dot org" says it's a lie and Google suppresses anything else showing the clarification of AJs hyperbole. AJ also doesn't put a whole lot of effort into translating his hyperbole and when you combine that with being cancelled from all social media and mainstream sources so he couldn't, even if he wanted to, that's when you get normies with bad takes on who AJ is.
I don't think it's a bad thing to not clarify your hyperbolic points though. The ones with a truly balanced and curious mind will figure it out on their own, which further bolsters one's critical thinking skills. Which is what we're lacking as a culture anymore.
Idk man. AJ says, and I think many would agree with this statement regardless, that "everything is a psy-op". It doesn't mean the psy-op is always bad though. You can't force people to think more critically. They have to figure out how on their own, or drown. I wouldn't take his Q denials to heart. He doesn't even focus on it that much and he certainly doesn't go into detail on it. The guy has a long history of exposing fucked up shit and a near perfect score doing it. It just doesn't make sense that he'd be running interference for some deep state organization now.
Then again, maybe the internet is a fucking psy-op and I'm literally a gorilla.
I'm with you, I don't think this is over. I have always been "Q-Curious" at the very least. My intel background and some of the stronger proofs solidified that in my eyes SOMETHING is happening. I was on the board browsing during the "Tippy Top Shape" request. Then it happened, lost my fucking mind. 100% believed that Q is at least a legitimate person (or more likely AI) connected to Trump admin.
Troops in DC, PEDOUTS still hasnt been on AF1, no 21 gun salute...no actual LAWS signed (just EOs/EAs)...the whole thing feels like the matrix, to even the normals.
The problem with reddit-style sites is the echo chamber it creates due to upvoted content being shown more, thus getting upvoted thus being shown more. Add that we are all upvotes all the time (CSS blocks downvotes on posts) making the chamber 'worse'.
I understand the PW anger, because the "hivemind" thinks that checking out Q means a lack of real action. I disagree (you and other are evidence) but I understand. We "lost" and it hurts. If we are proven right, I hope this community extends olive branches more than "told you so"s. The aftermath is going to be a messy cleanup and at the end of the day both groups have the same goals and ideals.
Because you're my first and longest lasting TDW friend, you get my AJ theory....
My theory is honestly that AJ is on team Patriot. AJ had Gen Flynn on for an interview right before the 6th (I think it was the 4th). You're telling me you have a person who might be the most publicly connected to Q and that ISNT what they talked about off camera??? I think AJ is one or two rings from the "inner circle" if you will. After that interview Flynn gave AJ some guidance.
Also POTUS basically launched his campaign from Infowars, and in the beginning he was there the most often. A really good argument could be made that POTUS won the primary mainly due to AJ's audience. For much of his 1st term, he talked to AJ on a monthly (ish) basis. MSM made a HUGE deal about it, and the WH confirmed it was happening.
The enemy wanted the 6th to be a catastrophe, an ultimate victory for them was a burned down capitol, and a martyr. Go watch speeches from the House/Senate after the storming, how did they all write looooong speeches about the tragic event while they were in the tunnels escaping said event? Staged.
POTUS knew of at least some of this was going down, which was why he stretched out the speech (I think I remember him saying something like "you arent going to like this speech its kind of boring"). All the chaos started before he was done speaking. AJ and others were at least somewhat involved in the coordination of that day. (or at least the coordination of the publicly facing plan)
My theory is that Flynn told AJ where to be, what to do, what to say. Those instructions were basically "act as if all has failed". AJ then goes on the Q hating spree of his life. He was always neutral or dismissive of Q, overnight he turns into one of the largest critics. Since the 6th he and other hosts say odd things like "Kind of odd the China Joe isn't using AF1" "So weird that we haven't heard the 21 gun salute yet"...
What is the best way to convince the enemy they have won? Change your messaging to your own people that all is lost. Art of War and basic tactical doctrine support this.
I know he isnt a super popular guy, but if AJ comes out at the end of all this and has a video of him working with Flynn, I will not be surprised. Disinfo is necessary. Q calling AJ out was either disinfo, or a "shut the fuck up or you're out" kind of move. (remember he was saying he knew people involved and stuff)
As for the name change...from a technical perspective I understand the reasoning. That other guy owned the domain. So he was a liability. Similar to Parler being on AWS really. One glaring weakness. I did my due diligence, checked how I know how to check, I don't like the name change, but I trust Doggos and after the change, the site raised no alarms for me. I have worked in tech/IT for a decade and I give it the CrackBaby seal of approval.
I ranted as I do, but I have been here and there the whole time. Not as active but here. Last summer I promised myself a break after the election, Nov 3rd quickly turned into Jan 20. So I am just starting to come back. Got my site running at full swing, with a weekly podcast with a friend. Waiting/hoping for the hammer to drop.
This sounds about right to me and how I’ve always viewed him. I always said that Jones has spoken the truth on a lot of things but he mixes in the batshit insane stuff too. almost like a cover. Like he can say the batshit insane true things but because he ranted about frogs being turned gay, it makes the rest of what he says look ridiculous. “Oh that’s the frogs are gay guy? Don’t believe a word of what he says.”
Remember when he started getting too into the truth and they threatened his family and he kinda simmered down? Yeah.
I love when people use the frogs gay line as a way of showing how "wrong" AJ is...
https://news.berkeley.edu/2010/03/01/frogs/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2842049/
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/atrazine-water-tied-hormonal-irregularities/
https://www.ewg.org/enviroblog/2017/08/atrazine-harmful-weedkiller-taints-tap-water-millions-us
Maybe "forced transitioning" or "feminizing males" is a better phrase. But there really is a chemical shown to feminize frogs (and others) that is found in certain areas' drinking water. In my opinion with the intention to feminize men.
AJ has a lot of retarded redneck followers (I say that as a florida born and raised "redneck") that don't understand how to make sense of hyperbole. And so they go around announcing verbatim that frogs are literally turning gay to all the normies. Normies in turn use google to fact check and see that "factcheck dot org" says it's a lie and Google suppresses anything else showing the clarification of AJs hyperbole. AJ also doesn't put a whole lot of effort into translating his hyperbole and when you combine that with being cancelled from all social media and mainstream sources so he couldn't, even if he wanted to, that's when you get normies with bad takes on who AJ is.
I don't think it's a bad thing to not clarify your hyperbolic points though. The ones with a truly balanced and curious mind will figure it out on their own, which further bolsters one's critical thinking skills. Which is what we're lacking as a culture anymore.
Idk man. AJ says, and I think many would agree with this statement regardless, that "everything is a psy-op". It doesn't mean the psy-op is always bad though. You can't force people to think more critically. They have to figure out how on their own, or drown. I wouldn't take his Q denials to heart. He doesn't even focus on it that much and he certainly doesn't go into detail on it. The guy has a long history of exposing fucked up shit and a near perfect score doing it. It just doesn't make sense that he'd be running interference for some deep state organization now.
Then again, maybe the internet is a fucking psy-op and I'm literally a gorilla.
My thoughts exactly. Alex opened my eyes years ago and I’ll always have a soft spot for him. But...
holy shit. Rooftoptendie?? Are you the dude who ran a meme bootcamp forever ago?
I'm with you, I don't think this is over. I have always been "Q-Curious" at the very least. My intel background and some of the stronger proofs solidified that in my eyes SOMETHING is happening. I was on the board browsing during the "Tippy Top Shape" request. Then it happened, lost my fucking mind. 100% believed that Q is at least a legitimate person (or more likely AI) connected to Trump admin.
Troops in DC, PEDOUTS still hasnt been on AF1, no 21 gun salute...no actual LAWS signed (just EOs/EAs)...the whole thing feels like the matrix, to even the normals.
The problem with reddit-style sites is the echo chamber it creates due to upvoted content being shown more, thus getting upvoted thus being shown more. Add that we are all upvotes all the time (CSS blocks downvotes on posts) making the chamber 'worse'.
I understand the PW anger, because the "hivemind" thinks that checking out Q means a lack of real action. I disagree (you and other are evidence) but I understand. We "lost" and it hurts. If we are proven right, I hope this community extends olive branches more than "told you so"s. The aftermath is going to be a messy cleanup and at the end of the day both groups have the same goals and ideals.
Because you're my first and longest lasting TDW friend, you get my AJ theory....
My theory is honestly that AJ is on team Patriot. AJ had Gen Flynn on for an interview right before the 6th (I think it was the 4th). You're telling me you have a person who might be the most publicly connected to Q and that ISNT what they talked about off camera??? I think AJ is one or two rings from the "inner circle" if you will. After that interview Flynn gave AJ some guidance.
Also POTUS basically launched his campaign from Infowars, and in the beginning he was there the most often. A really good argument could be made that POTUS won the primary mainly due to AJ's audience. For much of his 1st term, he talked to AJ on a monthly (ish) basis. MSM made a HUGE deal about it, and the WH confirmed it was happening.
The enemy wanted the 6th to be a catastrophe, an ultimate victory for them was a burned down capitol, and a martyr. Go watch speeches from the House/Senate after the storming, how did they all write looooong speeches about the tragic event while they were in the tunnels escaping said event? Staged.
POTUS knew of at least some of this was going down, which was why he stretched out the speech (I think I remember him saying something like "you arent going to like this speech its kind of boring"). All the chaos started before he was done speaking. AJ and others were at least somewhat involved in the coordination of that day. (or at least the coordination of the publicly facing plan)
My theory is that Flynn told AJ where to be, what to do, what to say. Those instructions were basically "act as if all has failed". AJ then goes on the Q hating spree of his life. He was always neutral or dismissive of Q, overnight he turns into one of the largest critics. Since the 6th he and other hosts say odd things like "Kind of odd the China Joe isn't using AF1" "So weird that we haven't heard the 21 gun salute yet"...
What is the best way to convince the enemy they have won? Change your messaging to your own people that all is lost. Art of War and basic tactical doctrine support this.
I know he isnt a super popular guy, but if AJ comes out at the end of all this and has a video of him working with Flynn, I will not be surprised. Disinfo is necessary. Q calling AJ out was either disinfo, or a "shut the fuck up or you're out" kind of move. (remember he was saying he knew people involved and stuff)
As for the name change...from a technical perspective I understand the reasoning. That other guy owned the domain. So he was a liability. Similar to Parler being on AWS really. One glaring weakness. I did my due diligence, checked how I know how to check, I don't like the name change, but I trust Doggos and after the change, the site raised no alarms for me. I have worked in tech/IT for a decade and I give it the CrackBaby seal of approval.
I ranted as I do, but I have been here and there the whole time. Not as active but here. Last summer I promised myself a break after the election, Nov 3rd quickly turned into Jan 20. So I am just starting to come back. Got my site running at full swing, with a weekly podcast with a friend. Waiting/hoping for the hammer to drop.
I hope you are well my friend.