I’ve been watching this movement for a long, long time (only discovered Q in the last year, and was converted after Nov. 3rd)... and I’m still puzzled about many players.
I was also converted from a Trump hater (2015) to ABSOLUTELY LOVING this president— BASED ON HIS ACTIONS.
I am still struggling to reconcile words & actions about these (and more) of the following characters (and their “back and forth” over the past few years):
- Mitch McConnell (even as recently as Saturday... why argue to acquit, then vote to acquit, and then promptly lambaste and threaten??)
- Ted Cruz, to some extent...
- MATT DRUDGE
- ANNE COULTER
- Dan Crenshaw
- Mike Pence (if that WAS Mike Pence)
- Jared Kushner
- Kelly Loeffler
- Marsha Blackburn
Are they playing a part? Controlled opposition? I’m especially curious about Drudge Report and Anne Coulter.
I also don’t get the whole Mr. & Mrs. Conway thing. Is there a rational, real explanation for that weirdness?
Answer is military is in control everyone is playing a part. It's over when the public knows
I don't have opinions on all of these people, but here are a few thoughts:
I think that Mike Pence is actually a good egg who is under deep cover as a bad egg - wondering if it Lin Wood's job is to reinforce his cover. I think that Mitch McConnell is trying to play both sides and may well also be under cover. As hard as it is to accept, I don't think that Trump wanted to be inaugurated in January, I think that he wanted all of this to play out for a period of months to fully expose the left. As for Drudge - it may be a combination of Chinese money and blackmail, but he was such a decent guy for so long and what he is doing is so out of character that I have also contemplated that he may be under cover as well to get the inside scoop on how they control and coordinate the fake news media. Lots of crazy things will probably come out eventually and more crazy things will never be known.
Nikki Haley, too. I mean, what in THE ACTUAL hell happened to her?
Sigh. Kavanaugh and ACB...
The first bullet point
He acquitted because it was unconstitutional.
I don’t disagree with this at all. I’m confused about what he did AFTER that. Why lay into him, and say “this isn’t over”? That was the weird part.
Because the acquittal WAS NOT TREASON.
There are no repercussions for mouthing off to the press.