This clip seems to be very much out of context. Is she referring to SOMEONE that violated Buyden's standards and expectations that works under her?? OR is she actually referring to Buyden? without seeing it the statement in context I won't jump to conclusions. However, if she is indeed referring to Buyden, then yes this is 100% worthy of the **it storm that needs to follow
This clip seems to be very much out of context. Is she referring to SOMEONE that violated Buyden's standards and expectations that works under her?? OR is she actually referring to Buyden? without seeing it the statement in context I won't jump to conclusions. However, if she is indeed referring to Buyden, then yes this is 100% worthy of the **it storm that needs to follow