This paper says absolutely nothing about mRNA altering DNA. It talks about how a modification of a particular base (mRNA is made up of a long chain of bases) can increase protein expression. This subsequent increased protein expression can alter the EXPRESSION of certain genes. This is well known cell biology and has been known for decades. The only thing new in this paper is the understanding that this specific base alteration can cause an increase in protein translation (its not the only one that does that).
Altering protein expression has absolutely NOTHING to do with changing DNA. EVERYTHING alters protein expression. Like, literally everything. Its the main basic function of all cell biology. If you eat too much Vitamin C, or donuts, or coffee, or breath faster, or look to the left, somewhere in your body protein expression is going to change.
The reason why this particular paper is interesting is because the discovery does allow for an increase of protein translation efficiency that would otherwise not happen without the modification of the base. In other words, we can inject mRNA into the cell with this particular modification that would allow it to be more potent than it would be without the modification. The Pfizer immunotherapy (its not a vaccine) has a similar (maybe the same, I'd have to look) technology to make it more potent.
I want to say thank you for such an excellent response in this discussion. I will look at the article you posted tomorrow.
I will also say that yes, Cancer is absolutely DNA modification, but it isn't intentional DNA modification (at least I hope not). At the very least it isn't directed DNA modification, which is what is implied by the term.
The mRNA modification that I was aware of on the spike protein mRNA in the vaccine is used to enhance ribosome binding, thereby increasing its efficacy. This is not an uncommon modification in protein production. I was not aware however of all the studies of other mods that were discussed in the article you linked to. It is quite fascinating that all these effects have been linked to specific mods. It warrants further exploration.
I am not aware of any other epigenetic mods in the vaccine mRNA other than the binding enhancement. That does not mean that they don't exist. In truth, it would be an excellent place to hide a nefarious activator; however, unless there is evidence of it, I will not indulge fantasies (there are too many other more tangible avenues of research that demand attention).
I have not been able to find the exact mRNA of the vaccine (including modifications). In truth, studying it even if I were able to find it would take quite a long time. I am not an expert in epigenetics and would have to look up every detail to get a complete picture. I will keep an eye out for papers on this topic. If anything comes out I will post on it.
I really haven't looked into the likely causes of death yet. Well, I have, but the literature is so shallow, and the reports non-existent, so to dig deeper I have to dig deep (go back in time and look into similar models before it became political).
The basic premise of the drug is to cause an autoimmune response. Its designed to infect the muscle cells, adipose tissue, etc. and cause the body to attack those cells, but only those cells, that are expressing the viral spike protein. This is intended to train the immune system to attack the virus (covered in the same spike protein) when it is encountered.
If I had to guess (and please, this is ONLY a guess at this time), I would guess the deaths that are relatively recent after injection are likely due to a run amok immune response that attacks an organ, or perhaps the blood vessels. For example, if after the injection the mRNA carrying nanoparticles made it through the bloodstream and ended up in epithelial cells in the brain or heart it could cause those blood vessel cells to be attacked by the immune system which could cause a breakdown of the blood vessels. This could cause something that was basically a stroke, aneurism or heart attack.
From the death reports that I have seen of the younger people, they have been of this type, so it fits the (very small amount of) data. Because the data set is so small, and because they are absolutely hiding the data this is STRICTLY a guess I am pulling out of my ass (with a fair bit of knowledge behind it).
I feel like I'm playing Whack-O-Mole.
This paper says absolutely nothing about mRNA altering DNA. It talks about how a modification of a particular base (mRNA is made up of a long chain of bases) can increase protein expression. This subsequent increased protein expression can alter the EXPRESSION of certain genes. This is well known cell biology and has been known for decades. The only thing new in this paper is the understanding that this specific base alteration can cause an increase in protein translation (its not the only one that does that).
Altering protein expression has absolutely NOTHING to do with changing DNA. EVERYTHING alters protein expression. Like, literally everything. Its the main basic function of all cell biology. If you eat too much Vitamin C, or donuts, or coffee, or breath faster, or look to the left, somewhere in your body protein expression is going to change.
The reason why this particular paper is interesting is because the discovery does allow for an increase of protein translation efficiency that would otherwise not happen without the modification of the base. In other words, we can inject mRNA into the cell with this particular modification that would allow it to be more potent than it would be without the modification. The Pfizer immunotherapy (its not a vaccine) has a similar (maybe the same, I'd have to look) technology to make it more potent.
I want to say thank you for such an excellent response in this discussion. I will look at the article you posted tomorrow.
I will also say that yes, Cancer is absolutely DNA modification, but it isn't intentional DNA modification (at least I hope not). At the very least it isn't directed DNA modification, which is what is implied by the term.
More tomorrow.
The mRNA modification that I was aware of on the spike protein mRNA in the vaccine is used to enhance ribosome binding, thereby increasing its efficacy. This is not an uncommon modification in protein production. I was not aware however of all the studies of other mods that were discussed in the article you linked to. It is quite fascinating that all these effects have been linked to specific mods. It warrants further exploration.
I am not aware of any other epigenetic mods in the vaccine mRNA other than the binding enhancement. That does not mean that they don't exist. In truth, it would be an excellent place to hide a nefarious activator; however, unless there is evidence of it, I will not indulge fantasies (there are too many other more tangible avenues of research that demand attention).
I have not been able to find the exact mRNA of the vaccine (including modifications). In truth, studying it even if I were able to find it would take quite a long time. I am not an expert in epigenetics and would have to look up every detail to get a complete picture. I will keep an eye out for papers on this topic. If anything comes out I will post on it.
I really haven't looked into the likely causes of death yet. Well, I have, but the literature is so shallow, and the reports non-existent, so to dig deeper I have to dig deep (go back in time and look into similar models before it became political).
The basic premise of the drug is to cause an autoimmune response. Its designed to infect the muscle cells, adipose tissue, etc. and cause the body to attack those cells, but only those cells, that are expressing the viral spike protein. This is intended to train the immune system to attack the virus (covered in the same spike protein) when it is encountered.
If I had to guess (and please, this is ONLY a guess at this time), I would guess the deaths that are relatively recent after injection are likely due to a run amok immune response that attacks an organ, or perhaps the blood vessels. For example, if after the injection the mRNA carrying nanoparticles made it through the bloodstream and ended up in epithelial cells in the brain or heart it could cause those blood vessel cells to be attacked by the immune system which could cause a breakdown of the blood vessels. This could cause something that was basically a stroke, aneurism or heart attack.
From the death reports that I have seen of the younger people, they have been of this type, so it fits the (very small amount of) data. Because the data set is so small, and because they are absolutely hiding the data this is STRICTLY a guess I am pulling out of my ass (with a fair bit of knowledge behind it).