BREAKING: South Carolina passes bill that bans nearly all abortions.
(media.greatawakening.win)
WINS OF THE DAY
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (131)
sorted by:
Here’s a long list of scientific references that prove you wrong. https://www.princeton.edu/~prolife/articles/embryoquotes2.html
Also, learn some basic high school biology. Learn the difference between an organism (a living being) vs a living cell, such as a skin cell, that is a part of an organism.
“Being” simply means state of existence. Human organisms are synonymous with human beings.
Nothing there is proven. It is simply an account of the stages of formation, but does not prove a collection of genetic material = a person.
I already knew this.
You can clone a person from a cell but a cell isn't a person.
Learn some real biology. An "organism" is nothing more than a collection of relevant information that develops into a person. Once a person is developed you have a human being, not before. Until then it's just information that has no unique identifiers that we consider "human". Heartbeat, brain activity, etc.
Yes, that's the point that you keep missing.
No they aren't. They are two distinct stages of development.
Holy shit. You have no idea what an organism is. Here, educate yourself. Organisms aren’t limited to Homo sapiens. There’s even single cell organisms of other species.
https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/organism
Also, “person” is a legal term that has nothing to do with science. Governments can declare illegal aliens, blacks, or Jews are not “persons” just like you’re discriminating against the human organisms that are still on the other side of the birth canal.
I always knew. The problem here is you don't even know what you're arguing.
Nobody said they were? You're just going through cyber vomit now saying anything hoping something sticks.
Yes I know, hence why science has not defined what makes a person yet.
Duuuuuurrrrr
It's called observation, not discrimination.
You are operating under the delusion that a complete set of data (sperm + egg = conception) qualifies as a human. Regardless of the fact you don't even understand the implications of your own argument, I have pointed out how a complete set of data (parts of me) don't qualify as me. That's because the data on it's own isn't a person or even human. In the same way a line of code isn't the internet, my complete DNA is not me. It must develop into a person.
At the end of the day you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about.
“At the end of the day” you still have no clue of what an “organism” is and you refuse to look at the resources I provided to explain the biological definition that you should have learned in high school biology.