BREAKING: BIDEN Just Told The Government To TAKE OVER Christianity In America
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
There is a person sometimes called “the black pope,” but his existence is not a secret and he does not have anywhere near as much power as the real pope. “The black pope” is a nickname given to the Father General of the Society of Jesus. When the Jesuits were the most prestigious, influential missionary order in the world, the people of Rome began to speak jokingly of their head as a second pope. They called him “the black pope” because he wore the Jesuits’ black clerical garb, in contrast to the real pope, who wore white and became known as “the white pope.”
“The black pope” does not have authority over anyone but Jesuits. Sometimes people point to him as evidence of a conspiracy in the Vatican, but what they really have is a garbled understanding of a Catholic in-joke.
The people who have a problem with the Jesuits were the theosophists (read as: Qabballah, Jewish mysticism, Rosicrucianism), Freemasons and the Nazis.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZrJYyhYk9s&list=PLOtKxMklQeXblEcia__pQt7psDuMRc2sA&index=7
Which one are you?
Or are you going to feign ignorance?
Careful what you believe from the internet.
That's what I wrote.
What makes him an asshole?
The Jesuits were an anti-Communist order.
In 1934, the Society of Jesus was asked to respond at global and regional levels to the increasing threat of world Communism. In North America, the Jesuits initiated plans to meet the twin threats of Communism and atheism. Between 1934 and 1939, two separate streams of Jesuit anti-Communism began to emerge. The first was a macro-style vision grounded in social reconstruction, which the Jesuits called “Establishing a Christian Social Order,” known colloquially as the “xo” program. The other plan was put forward as early as 1934, and elaborated in July 1936 at the Jesuit meeting in West Baden, Indiana, by the writer and editor John LaFarge. LaFarge’s plan, known as the United Front, has never been evaluated by historians. It was a localized program of reactive initiatives meant to meet the gains of the cpusa with effective Catholic counter-Communist public attacks. LaFarge aimed to recruit students, pastors, and fellow Jesuits to see to it that cpusa gains in labor, culture, education, government, and churches were met with equal and effective public counterattacks. In 1937, the publication of the papal encyclical Divini redemptoris signaled that social reconstruction could become a part of authentic Catholic anti-Communism, indicating the eclipse of LaFarge’s United Front. After 1939, when the Jesuit general Włodzimierz Ledóchowski called for an adoption of the “positive message” of social reconstruction as the dominant means of Jesuit anti-Communism, LaFarge’s more bumptious and militaristic plan began to fade for good. This article chronicles the heretofore unknown struggle between these two antipodes.
Is being anti-Communist a bad thing? If yes, hello Rofschild. Satan doesn't have any other busywork for you?
If you cannot answer, your claim is bullshit.
How about backing up your claims with some evidence? Theories? Anything?