Yes, Xi is consolidating power for more control of the money the Chinese slaves make him and his cronies. Trump was purging the kind of people Xi is appointing now.
Of course this could be completely off base. But I figure its better to consider every possibility, no matter how far fetched, until the truth emerges.
Yes, I read it. I admit that I struggled to process much of it. I never paid much attention to China’s politics until recently. So my theory may indeed be way off base.
That said, I suspect that Trump’s visit may have been a game changer for Xi. So perhaps despite his past, he has thrown his hat in the ring to cooperate with the white hats.
A tree is revealed by its fruits.
Xi a white hat?
Look at what he has China do.
Thanks Xi for your biological and political warfare against the United States and the world. Some white hat.
His opposing the Jiang faction does not make him a good guy, it's just one evil communist faction vs another evil communist faction.
Show me his good works. Any. His evil works are easy to find.
Did you read the article past the headline? It does not support your point, at all. Only the headline appears to.
Exactly!
Yes, Xi is consolidating power for more control of the money the Chinese slaves make him and his cronies. Trump was purging the kind of people Xi is appointing now.
i have wondered if he is a toothless tiger propped up as the boogie man by his own commie deep state... kinda like rocket man.
Thats my thinking as well.
Of course this could be completely off base. But I figure its better to consider every possibility, no matter how far fetched, until the truth emerges.
Yes, I read it. I admit that I struggled to process much of it. I never paid much attention to China’s politics until recently. So my theory may indeed be way off base.
That said, I suspect that Trump’s visit may have been a game changer for Xi. So perhaps despite his past, he has thrown his hat in the ring to cooperate with the white hats.
What do I know? But I’m sticking with...
Xi. Surprise white hat. Final answer.