NOTHING TO SEE HERE: Recall For California's Governor Gavin Newsome Already Has A 50% Signature Rejection Rate Compared To California's 0.06% Rejection Rate Of Absentee Ballots During The Presidential Election - The Great Awakening

204

NOTHING TO SEE HERE: Recall For California's Governor Gavin Newsome Already Has A 50% Signature Rejection Rate Compared To California's 0.06% Rejection Rate Of Absentee Ballots During The Presidential Election (gab.com)

posted 3 years ago by CrsCrpr 3 years ago by CrsCrpr +206 / -2

23 comments

23 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (23)

sorted by:

▲ -1 ▼

– InABlinkOfAnEye -1 points 3 years ago +1 / -2

First off I am no fan of Newsome and the sooner he's gone the better. To my understanding alot of these votes were done online. I recall the petition going around. I read that they were going to disallow anyone who voted for the recall who doesn't live in CA. I agree with u/richard-engineer that the signatures are valid so what's really going on? Were alot of the votes from out of state?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– InABlinkOfAnEye 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Thank you. I wasn't aware that the majority were done in person.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

▲ 1 ▼

– InABlinkOfAnEye 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Thank you. I agree. I wasn't aware before I posted my question that the signatures were obtained in person.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q