Also, other courts. Judges not needed if you get rid of precedent (legislating from the bench) and "interpreting the law" (legislating from bench). AI would judge based on the intent of the law, not what some judge says it is. Judges have usurped power from the people for far too long.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
Have you seen this article on clarity in AI's: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/f9kuryi8/release/6
Yes. It was a while ago. The authors are spot on. I'm striving for mathematical provablity of computational systems. I'm using topology and category theory. It's hard to explain but because of a whole set of erroneous theory, AI systems (and softwares in general) are far more complicated then needed. Are you familiar with the work of Kurt Gödel?