160 Pretty sure I found something here, but I can’t verify if this is true. I saw this on Gab and wanted to fact check the post so I went to the link (I’ll provide it below). If anyone can read this and see if the claim is correct. Just need more people to see this. READ...??? (media.greatawakening.win) posted 3 years ago by Wishiwastrumpswife 3 years ago by Wishiwastrumpswife +161 / -1 21 comments download share 21 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
I had to have someone else look at it because I was having a difficult time interpreting it myself, glad it wasn’t just me.
I wish they'd have just rewritten the Act with all of the changes incorporated instead of having to figure out what sections to replace with what
we know they intentionally make these legal docs all gobbly guk though
You’re right! I was beginning to feel dumb for not being able to comprehend that. Lol
For days I've been trying to find both versions of this act and perform some copy and paste magic but haven't had any luck.
Here's a diff of the current and previous version: https://www.diffchecker.com/37c0FNU3
Still not the easiest thing to read, but this just seems like small administrative details.