It clearly doesn't matter if it's there or not. The fact that you smoothbrains actually think someone that raped a woman would come out and say "hey I raped her, save my kid". Incase I need to spell it out for you, that's an instant admission of guilt, in a court of law. So YES in this instance in regards to the quote i posted the verbiage of the bill is a moot point. Tbe verbiage of the bill has no effect on the ignorance of that quote. I did not post that to debate whether or not it was in the bill, I simply posted that to show how fucking stupid these people are.
“This extreme and dangerous bill would even allow a rapist to stop his victim from ending a pregnancy,” Weinberg added.
These people really are absolute smoothbrains
Is there verbiage in the bill that disallows this scenario?
Doesn't really matter honestly, you missed the point
You make these assumptions often?
I asked a question. If you don't have an answer then piss off.
It clearly doesn't matter if it's there or not. The fact that you smoothbrains actually think someone that raped a woman would come out and say "hey I raped her, save my kid". Incase I need to spell it out for you, that's an instant admission of guilt, in a court of law. So YES in this instance in regards to the quote i posted the verbiage of the bill is a moot point. Tbe verbiage of the bill has no effect on the ignorance of that quote. I did not post that to debate whether or not it was in the bill, I simply posted that to show how fucking stupid these people are.