Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING - Do Not Get the COVID Vaccine
(brandnewtube.com)
WINS OF THE DAY
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
Even if you believe none of these ask yourself why HCQ was taken off the table. Ask why the government got between doctor and patient by forbidding pharmacies to dispense HCQ. When you get the flu or a cold, who do you see? Do you see your doctor or do you make an appointment with an immunologist or virologist. You've questioned the value of the opinions of these doctors. Im asking when and from where Bill Gates got his degrees in immunology and virology.
Rekt
That's what all these non-critical thinkers like to do, immediately disparage your source. You have a team of doctors as your source and they'll tear them down for not being the right kind of doctor. But they listen to celebrities and Hollywood tell them how to think snice they were 5.
What percentage of medical doctors that team you mentioned comprise? Since you seem to trust doctors so much, what about all the other doctors who encourage people to take the vaccine?
I'm not going to say I agree with these doctors because I didn't watch the video or research them specifically. But that is a pattern I've noticed with a lot of people, particularly lefties but I'm sure it applies to others. When presented with information they disagree with, their first instinct is to dismiss the validity of your source. I seen it countless times in my life. Recently, when it came to voter fraud they would dismiss the 1,000 affidavits of course. Then you'd say, "well here's one from a Yale mathematician," and they'd come back with some link to try and smear his credibility. "Well here's multiple military intelligence people who have given sworn testimony about it." And then they come back with why you can't trust them. Basically, they rarely get around to actually discussing the topic at hand because they will simply dismiss the sources credibility and of course, the topic itself is entirely off the table at that point.
When it comes to vaccines (or really anything), I don't care at all about the credentials of the person making the claim. It could be a doctor, a nurse, or some person who simply researches it in their spare time. I will listen to all and consider all, and look at the logic, reasoning, and research presented.
Now about this vaccine in particular, freedom and individual rights trumps this vaccine to me regardless. I don't think government ever has the right to force people to take a vaccine. And I don't think businesses should be compelled in anyway to hire people based on whether they got the vaccine or not. And I do think the vaccine is unhealthy for people, and I think our natural immune system is more than strong enough to fight against the (lol, 99.9% survival rate) China Virus.
Appreciate your detailed reply.
Attacking the source is a common maneuver that is only human. Sometimes unfortunate, but sometimes valid, like when a lady says she was impregnated by a demon in her dream, well, it cuts into her credibility no matter whose side she's on.
I like to base things on logic, but I recognize that sometimes an expert in the field is better at analyzing facts and coming to conclusions than I am. And knowing both sides of the argument only strengthens your own, so I'm glad to hear thaty you listen to and consider all that's out there.
The argument about individual rights is valid, but I hope you recognize that there can be debate. People have to wear clothing outside their homes, and this doesn't infringe on their individual rights because of its effect on other people. So does taking the vaccine have an effect on other people? That's the argument that one should be making.