Exactly. Laura Silsby was just rescuing poor refugees...right? Surely she wasn't trafficking children. No way. These people are saints! They would NEVER! Plus the mainstream media would have told me they were THAT evil. Right?
The video in the OP isn't about the host, it's about Nicholas Winton and the children he rescued. The host isn't relevant. Please share with us your information that shows or at least suggests any one of the following:
Nicholas Winton was a pedophile and/or child trafficker
Nicholas Winton and the host had some type of relationship or connection
Nicholas Winton and Jimmy Saville had some type of relationship or connection
Nicholas Winton "rescued" those children for the purpose of trafficking them
The children were in fact trafficked or abused by their adopted families
The children had some kind of contact with or connection to Jimmy Saville
Did you read the title of the thread you're posting in?
Children taken as "refugees" and given to perverts instead. You know, like the system we have in place now...some 30/40 years later? All under the guise of humanitarianism? Thanks for playing.
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…then you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
I'm not accusing anyone of anything except that I don't trust what comes out of these peoples mouths because of their bedfellows and historical precedence for these types of matters. "Oh just removing some refugee children," said Laura Silsby. Humanitarian efforts can be human trafficking efforts as we have seen. That's, in fact, why we're all here today.
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
YES.
Folks interpreting this to mean anything else aren't paying attention to history. I had a few people tell me I'm negative for thinking anything involving the trafficking of children under the guise of philanthropy should be looked at with a fine tooth comb. Checking out their associates (AHEM, JIMMY SAVILLE) is just the surface. To brush these things off is elementary. You don't make it onto the BBC and the nightly news without making a contract with the Rofschild Media Matrix which is also involved in human trafficking by way of covering up tracks and spinning the story so the bad guy looks like the good guy and vice versa.
THE HOST HUNG OUT WITH JIMMY SAVILLE. If that doesn't make you take a second think about this, what will?
https://ibb.co/7CKjjg0
https://ibb.co/tLPKmBM
https://ibb.co/2c4M2N7
https://ibb.co/59Zh8tN
https://ibb.co/44w7HBM
I imagine 3/4 of the BBC hung out with Jimmy Saville. It doesn't change what I think about the topic of the story.
Good point. By now, we should have learned to be suspicious of the media, what it presents, and why.
Exactly. Laura Silsby was just rescuing poor refugees...right? Surely she wasn't trafficking children. No way. These people are saints! They would NEVER! Plus the mainstream media would have told me they were THAT evil. Right?
The video in the OP isn't about the host, it's about Nicholas Winton and the children he rescued. The host isn't relevant. Please share with us your information that shows or at least suggests any one of the following:
Otherwise you're just just coming off as a troll.
Did you read the title of the thread you're posting in?
Children taken as "refugees" and given to perverts instead. You know, like the system we have in place now...some 30/40 years later? All under the guise of humanitarianism? Thanks for playing.
If you’re saying that Scavino’s message was:
A) Nicholas Winton was complicit in human trafficking and (civilian) “rescuers” have actually often themselves been predators,
and NOT:
B) (Clandestine military) rescuers are currently saving children from their satanic predators’ underground tunnels (which is how most people on this thread seem to be interpreting his tweet)
…then you have a perfectly valid interpretation, and one worth discussing. Is that what you’re trying to say?
The post’s title, BTW, works for either interpretation.
I'm not accusing anyone of anything except that I don't trust what comes out of these peoples mouths because of their bedfellows and historical precedence for these types of matters. "Oh just removing some refugee children," said Laura Silsby. Humanitarian efforts can be human trafficking efforts as we have seen. That's, in fact, why we're all here today.
YES.
Folks interpreting this to mean anything else aren't paying attention to history. I had a few people tell me I'm negative for thinking anything involving the trafficking of children under the guise of philanthropy should be looked at with a fine tooth comb. Checking out their associates (AHEM, JIMMY SAVILLE) is just the surface. To brush these things off is elementary. You don't make it onto the BBC and the nightly news without making a contract with the Rofschild Media Matrix which is also involved in human trafficking by way of covering up tracks and spinning the story so the bad guy looks like the good guy and vice versa.
You get it.