CERT DENIED - All Supreme Court cases
?️ DISCUSSION ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (334)
sorted by:
What is totally retarded is that they are saying that 'even though the number of late ballots was not enough to change the result it could be an issue next time'.
What they are totally failing to take into account is the cumulative effect of all the various different cheats that took place.
Each one on their may well have not been enough, but once you remove all the votes from one 'cheat' then that could easily change whether a different method of cheating would have been enough to effect the outcome.
They can't be that stupid, so it must be deliberate.
Definitely deliberate, though I wonder why, is it to show the people how corrupt they are or what.
Normies won't see this as corrupt. They see this as SCOTUS upholding the law. There is sadly no silver lining here. Those that think the fraud is real already know SCOTUS is corrupt. This only solidifies the normies positive view of the govt.
It's up to you and us to point out that it isn't that the courts are deciding that there was no fraud, they are refusing to hear the cases. You knew the Supreme Court wasn't going to hear these cases.