Read the dissent by Thomas. He flat out tells you that this issue is valid and should be ruled on, yet they did not. My guess is we are going to find out exactly who on the SCOTUS is corrupt and it's possible that even the justices that voted to grant the motion could have done so knowing that their position would not prevail.
This is a clear constitutional question, as indicated by Thomas. It's no longer a question of whether they are corrupt, they are.
Read the dissent by Thomas. He flat out tells you that this issue is valid and should be ruled on, yet they did not. My guess is we are going to find out exactly who on the SCOTUS is corrupt and it's possible that even the justices that voted to grant the motion could have done so knowing that their position would not prevail. This is a clear constitutional question, as indicated by Thomas. It's no longer a question of whether they are corrupt, they are.
There is definitely more going on behind the scenes than we are seeing.