I'm not buttering you up, but your comments make the most sense from a logical standpoint. It's like saying that the election fraud would have to be proven AFTER Trump won. Technically he did win but in the context as it stands now, it would be hard to justify fraud investigations by the person who was the beneficiary AND the accuser.

We were told numerous times that the Military was the way. Look at Myanmar. I'm still praying that Myanmar is a soft-launch of the Military action that we were promised, but with less people getting killed (hopefully). Myanmar has it's own troubled history with military intervention, but at least they seem to be going after the right people.