Neither the title of this post, nor the quoted tweet has anything to do with Craig Wright, let alone whether or not he is Satoshi.
You have been gas-lit and are being distracted by a misleading narrative designed to discredit BSV, utilizing all the same dirty commie tactics they used to attack Trump and his supporters.
You are no different from a libtard appealing to the opinions of "experts". The same biased experts who have conflicts of interest and huge personal incentives to publicly hold their opinion, as they have a vested interest in furthering certain dishonest narratives.
I would recommend you stop believing what other people tell you, and do some actual research, but I do understand why you would not be willing or capable of doing so. This is a very complicated situation related to a technical subject which requires extensive research about the history of many related things, as well as a technical understanding of block chain technology, in order to come to your own informed position.
Whether Craig Wright is actually Satoshi or not changes absolutely nothing about the facts of the situation and viability of the technology. That said, given everything I know, it's far more likely that he is Satoshi than not.
I can't tell if you are a troll, shill, or are just not very smart. I suspect you're just someone who themselves has a vested interest in BTC and have been gas-lit by a bunch of propaganda. You likely also understand so little about Bitcoin and related technologies, that you idolize people like names you seem to be fixated with, and think they are gods.
You behave like a brainwashed leftist who cannot think for themselves. You just repeat what you've been told, push your own narratives [which have nothing to do with anything to do with this post], and use logical fallacies to try to discredit anything that doesn't support your agenda.
You should find a new website to use, because this one is clearly not for you, as it's obvious that you place no value in understanding what you speak about, have no intention of doing actual research, or learning the objective truth about anything.
A coin named Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision has nothing to do with whether or not Craig Wright is Satoshi??
The coin is called Satoshi's Vision because it restores the protocol specified by the original whitepaper, and the vision that Satoshi always had for Bitcoin. That has nothing to do with whether or not Craig Wright is Satoshi. The name of the coin also has nothing to do with the facts about the technology it is built on.
Reasoning is not one if your strengths is it? I guess that is why you think Wright is Satoshi but don't know who Nick Szabo and Adam Back are?
You're really still strawmanning me with this bullshit like a dishonest troll? I actually pointed out they have clear conflicts of interest. Even if they didn't, I still wouldn't care less what they have to say, because I'm not going to appeal to authority, or "trust the experts", like an ignorant fool.
I actually have the technical understanding to be able to judge things for myself, and have done the research to understand everything relevant to the situation, so I can come to my own conclusions and don't need to blindly trust the opinion of others.
I have no intention of explaining anything to you or trying to convince you of anything. I've waste far too much time on your foolishness already.
Trump did not win the election. Joe Biden and Barack Obama have both said that.
You don't know who they are do you?
Neither the title of this post, nor the quoted tweet has anything to do with Craig Wright, let alone whether or not he is Satoshi.
You have been gas-lit and are being distracted by a misleading narrative designed to discredit BSV, utilizing all the same dirty commie tactics they used to attack Trump and his supporters.
You are no different from a libtard appealing to the opinions of "experts". The same biased experts who have conflicts of interest and huge personal incentives to publicly hold their opinion, as they have a vested interest in furthering certain dishonest narratives.
I would recommend you stop believing what other people tell you, and do some actual research, but I do understand why you would not be willing or capable of doing so. This is a very complicated situation related to a technical subject which requires extensive research about the history of many related things, as well as a technical understanding of block chain technology, in order to come to your own informed position.
Whether Craig Wright is actually Satoshi or not changes absolutely nothing about the facts of the situation and viability of the technology. That said, given everything I know, it's far more likely that he is Satoshi than not.
A coin named Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision has nothing to do with whether or not Craig Wright is Satoshi??
Reasoning is not one if your strengths is it? I guess that is why you think Wright is Satoshi but don't know who Nick Szabo and Adam Back are?
I can't tell if you are a troll, shill, or are just not very smart. I suspect you're just someone who themselves has a vested interest in BTC and have been gas-lit by a bunch of propaganda. You likely also understand so little about Bitcoin and related technologies, that you idolize people like names you seem to be fixated with, and think they are gods.
You behave like a brainwashed leftist who cannot think for themselves. You just repeat what you've been told, push your own narratives [which have nothing to do with anything to do with this post], and use logical fallacies to try to discredit anything that doesn't support your agenda.
You should find a new website to use, because this one is clearly not for you, as it's obvious that you place no value in understanding what you speak about, have no intention of doing actual research, or learning the objective truth about anything.
The coin is called Satoshi's Vision because it restores the protocol specified by the original whitepaper, and the vision that Satoshi always had for Bitcoin. That has nothing to do with whether or not Craig Wright is Satoshi. The name of the coin also has nothing to do with the facts about the technology it is built on.
You're really still strawmanning me with this bullshit like a dishonest troll? I actually pointed out they have clear conflicts of interest. Even if they didn't, I still wouldn't care less what they have to say, because I'm not going to appeal to authority, or "trust the experts", like an ignorant fool.
I actually have the technical understanding to be able to judge things for myself, and have done the research to understand everything relevant to the situation, so I can come to my own conclusions and don't need to blindly trust the opinion of others.
I have no intention of explaining anything to you or trying to convince you of anything. I've waste far too much time on your foolishness already.