or... evolution could be an integral part of the creator's plan. A planet is born, single-cell life erupts, becomes more complex, eventually you get a dominant bipedal species which becomes sentient and eventually spacefaring. Some of those sentients develop from hominid mammals, some from other types of mammals, others from reptiles, others from avian species? You get the idea? It explains a lot of things and makes sense. Even beyond THIS phase of existence there is allegedly "ascension" to be experienced. Constant growth from day one.
So much of what people call "science" is just fiction. Your hypothesis doesn't explain anything that needs explaining as far as I can tell, unless you're explaining a plot for a star trek episode.
I'm not trying to trample on anyone's beliefs. What you say sounds fun to talk about but it's just not necessary in any scientific inquiry.
But to your question - no, in reality, if no evidence supports the theory of evolution, then there is no reason to claim the creator used it. The mechanisms do not exist.
It's like even though you are capable of forming complete sentences, you simply created a pencil and let the wind take care of the rest. No point in it. Especially if you already wrote a whole book demonstrating your vast abilities.
or... evolution could be an integral part of the creator's plan. A planet is born, single-cell life erupts, becomes more complex, eventually you get a dominant bipedal species which becomes sentient and eventually spacefaring. Some of those sentients develop from hominid mammals, some from other types of mammals, others from reptiles, others from avian species? You get the idea? It explains a lot of things and makes sense. Even beyond THIS phase of existence there is allegedly "ascension" to be experienced. Constant growth from day one.
So much of what people call "science" is just fiction. Your hypothesis doesn't explain anything that needs explaining as far as I can tell, unless you're explaining a plot for a star trek episode.
I'm not trying to trample on anyone's beliefs. What you say sounds fun to talk about but it's just not necessary in any scientific inquiry.
But to your question - no, in reality, if no evidence supports the theory of evolution, then there is no reason to claim the creator used it. The mechanisms do not exist.
It's like even though you are capable of forming complete sentences, you simply created a pencil and let the wind take care of the rest. No point in it. Especially if you already wrote a whole book demonstrating your vast abilities.