Why do we need a third shot if it says the first two are 95% effective? Why increase immunity another 20 fold if it's already 95% effective? They're talking about a booster dose, but why do we need it if there is no mention of decline in immunity from the first two shots? Considering how bad of a response the people are having from the second dose, I wonder what will happen after a third. This appears like science has lost all logic and they're just shooting the masses up to see what happens without a scientific reason to do so.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Hahahah article says people got their first dose over six months ago. Since we are making up history now.... ugh
They didn’t kill enough the first time around soooooo. Since when did they start testing in May?