Why do we need a third shot if it says the first two are 95% effective? Why increase immunity another 20 fold if it's already 95% effective? They're talking about a booster dose, but why do we need it if there is no mention of decline in immunity from the first two shots? Considering how bad of a response the people are having from the second dose, I wonder what will happen after a third. This appears like science has lost all logic and they're just shooting the masses up to see what happens without a scientific reason to do so.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
I wish the 'experts' would study how long the natural antibodies from having gone through the virus actually lasts and remains protective. If scientists would verify the length of immunity (aka, chicken pox), then we could actually test for antibodies in communities and see how close we are to herd immunity at this point.
There are a lot of us who are pretty certain we had the virus and never got tested. If this info would help open the country again, I would agree to test for antibodies. Until then, no thanks.
I absolutely agree. I'm surprised they didn't test people for antibodies before giving out vaccines. In the beginning vaccines are precious and it doesn't make sense to give it to people who already naturally have antibodies.