Why is it they are so addiment about protecting the rights the election supervisors with the strict rule of law and ignore the rights of the citizens they serve?
Protecting the bank auditors books when he is suspected of embezzling money from the bank.
Except they protect the election supervisors without the law is not on their side. They are legally required to turn over those records. Their refusal to do so is illegal.
Our lawyers need to get better microphones.
It's hard to be persuasive when there's so much audio interference
So the judge will just say no standing or moot? Lol
Let's hope there is a good judge or two left.
But not a bad idea to temper your expectations.
Why is it they are so addiment about protecting the rights the election supervisors with the strict rule of law and ignore the rights of the citizens they serve? Protecting the bank auditors books when he is suspected of embezzling money from the bank.
Except they protect the election supervisors without the law is not on their side. They are legally required to turn over those records. Their refusal to do so is illegal.