Nice thing is, you get interesting commentary, and mistakes are made as well as overlooking things. Quite instructive. Especially, the way the king is mated. The king is walking into a trap. It also lends new perspective to ammunition is hard to come by.
In the game thereafter the question is raised of the importance of having a weak king. What do you do with your strongest piece?
Very good. I do not disagree, but for those interested, would you elaborate on why you think so?
The reason I paid a little more attention to how to win a chess game and the considerations pertaining to that, has to do with Q posts:
There are 11 posts with chess in it. Especially 4281 is in play:
Objective [end]: checkmate king
Do you attack the king at the beginning of the game?
Do you attack and remove pawns first?
Do you attack and remove bishops, rooks, knights next?
Do you attack and remove queen mid-to-end?
Is the game being played public or private?
Do emotions affect critical thinking?
Add: important king control pieces [elim rogue elements]?
Add: how do you set the stage [board] re: public opinion [optics]?
“At this time.”
Q
Since we are wired to learn by example, it seems obvious to have a resource that is showing HOW it is done.
But, let's discuss GO and why it pertains to where we are now
Awesome, Bitch down BOOM
Bruh!
Nice one.
Though given the circumstances I would recommend watching the 4th game in this video which starts at 58 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtaEnxG2lbg
Nice thing is, you get interesting commentary, and mistakes are made as well as overlooking things. Quite instructive. Especially, the way the king is mated. The king is walking into a trap. It also lends new perspective to ammunition is hard to come by.
In the game thereafter the question is raised of the importance of having a weak king. What do you do with your strongest piece?
And I LOL-ed!
That said, for our own amusement and edification, we might want to look into chess thinking a bit more.
Very good. I do not disagree, but for those interested, would you elaborate on why you think so?
The reason I paid a little more attention to how to win a chess game and the considerations pertaining to that, has to do with Q posts:
There are 11 posts with chess in it. Especially 4281 is in play:
Since we are wired to learn by example, it seems obvious to have a resource that is showing HOW it is done.
But, let's discuss GO and why it pertains to where we are now