An important point about January 6th that I do not hear being made.
The whole idea of this thing is contrary stupidity. If the good guys had "rioted" it would stop the vote and inhibit our own goals. Bam.
Seems exculpatory.
The tifatard stuff happened before the robots inside had done their thing. We still needed them to vote in our favor and until that point there was no (real) reason to "riot." It was still early in the day. There was work to do. Maybe they vote in our favor, maybe they don't. But until...
So why? Why shoot early..? Just because they're dumbasses? No.
Somebody pulled the trigger at a specific time. This demonstrates forethought. They needed it to happen at the right time to delay proceedings and claim it changed their minds or gave them an excuse to vote contrary to the evidence.
And as a bonus they get big mileage out of it after the fact in plenty of other ways too.
Thank you for reading. ~{°¡°}~
They synced their watches thinking their "riot" would cue right on time. BUT POTUS is never on time he was late to the podium and ran long hence why they were already "rioting" before the speech was even over. We hadn't even heard our "marching orders" or the vote results like you said.. They blew it but the media covered for them.
Trump already knew their plan. He did this to keep a lot of the good Patriots from being engaged in the planned attack on the Capitol. His speech was a 2 mile walk from the Capitol.
Even people who attended his speech said he seemed to be rambling. Probably just to keep them from getting there to be involved. I am not saying their weren't already some there... I believe there still were. But at least those who came to listen to POTUS Trump's speech were not.
Why do you think Trump called patriots to the capital?
He did it because he knew he would have thousands there in his support.
He didn't want them to engage in the staged Capitol riot event that was planned AFTER he called them to the Capitol to peacefully protest the electoral count.
Well put !
Solid points
Many talking heads have said this, however if the dominant MSM doesn’t report on it.....the narrative doesn’t change.
It was a rapid unscheduled tour (RUT), not a riot, not an insurection. The mostly peaceful capitol RUT
There is a lot of evidence that the whole incident was instigated by leftist and pre-planned. Too many to list concisely but some of the big ones are as follows:
Many of the people arrested were Antifa. Biggest name off the top of my head would be: John Sullivan. He was also being paid by CNN and MSNBC (both) for his footage of the incident.
The pipe bombs they found were actually planted there a day before. It took the FBI a long time to actually mention this detail. They wanted them blamed on the people who stormed the Capitol even though they had nothing to do with them.
Trump was late to speak (and maybe he did this on purpose). The venue where he did speak was approximately a 45 minutes walk from the Capitol. There was not enough time for people to walk from the Trump speech due to it's late start time (where all his most avoid supporters would have been) to the Capitol if they left at the end of his speech or even in the middle of it, in order to be involved in the breeching of the Capitol doors. It's suspicious that if Trump had started his speech on time, the schedule would have actually made sense.
The Capitol security chief at the time claimed he had contacted the higher ups to get more security, even the national guard, but his calls were not answered.
Some of the people breeching the Capitol had their own camera crews follow them in. This seems odd. In fact, we have a suspiciously large amount of footage from the incident. Like they knew it was going to happen and wanted to document it for propaganda purposes.
Like any criminal investigation, what is the first thing the detective looks at? Who gains from this.95% of the time that is your answer.