Dont freak out about that. Maybe a lawpede can provide clarification.

Judges dont want to interfere in elections in any way shape or form. Even the appearance of interfering is about the worst thing they can think of, given the "sacredness" of the vote. Of course it leads to the problem we have now.

I dont know for sure, again, some support please, but if you go in as said, just looking for clarification, I dont believe it will preclude the fact if you do infact find malfeasance, that you cannot pursue a remedy.

Basically if you find fraud while "only looking for clarification", it wont stop you from additional action to rectify the fraud.

However, you have to get there in the firstplace to even discover it. I dont know that this order is bad. I could be wrong, thats fine, but if it takes going through a legal maze to get there, I'm ok with it as long as we get there.