Where the D candidate is proven not to have won the Nov 3 election, the other candidate actually having received more votes, why do you want another election held?
What precedent and what law do you have, besides, what possible reason?
This election has unfortunately been tainted beyond redemption.
Without an incontrovertible record of the exact vote counts for each state, a new election would be the only way to settle the record definitively and transparently.
I dont think Trump would mind being elected a third time. Esp since he would win by even bigger numbers once the truth comes out.
He did mention that possibility in his CPAC speech yesterday, after all!!
Don't forget about down ballot races as well. We have pretty much no idea how any of these played out. And if the military ends up arresting a majority of Congress, who would replace them? We would likely need new elections across the board for both state and federal offices.
POTUS drained the swamp on November 3rd (Pence referenced this on November 2nd as well), now we need to clean out the swamp creatures that remain.
I saw with my own eyes on video captures Biden votes jump by an exact number as Trump votes dropped by the exact same number. It is not as if such was the single such case. That's easily corrected.
And if Sidney Powell and others are correct about fractional votes and pre-loading of machines, that's easily corrected.
Do you have evidence they are wrong?
Do you have evidence that hand count of physical ballots -- my goodness, imagine doing that! -- would leave dispute as to whether Trump won?
You think the Trump landslide was too small to prove who actually won?
Why?
You saying that 75 million-plus actual Trump votes vs perhaps 60-something million actual Biden votes as a guess are "beyond redemption" is you.
I note you couldn't name the law or precedent for holding a replacement election once fraud is proven the sole cause of a person having been falsely put into office..
What? No. Not saying that at all. You misunderstood me.
Im just saying that because crooked election officials in some states have destroyed paper ballots and/or wiped the voting records on the machined, it makes it really difficult to PROVE to the sheep how big the landslide really was. I think Trump won by 410 electoral votes. And maybe the mil can actually prove that. I don't know yet. If they can show undeniable proof, then Trump is declared rightful winner. Done.
But we will still need new elections in any case if the majority of congress is arrested for treason.
My point was we all know Trump won. Bigly. But we wont be able to move fwd in unity until everyone can see a FAIR and transparent election.
Where the D candidate is proven not to have won the Nov 3 election, the other candidate actually having received more votes, why do you want another election held?
What precedent and what law do you have, besides, what possible reason?
This election has unfortunately been tainted beyond redemption.
Without an incontrovertible record of the exact vote counts for each state, a new election would be the only way to settle the record definitively and transparently.
I dont think Trump would mind being elected a third time. Esp since he would win by even bigger numbers once the truth comes out.
He did mention that possibility in his CPAC speech yesterday, after all!!
Don't forget about down ballot races as well. We have pretty much no idea how any of these played out. And if the military ends up arresting a majority of Congress, who would replace them? We would likely need new elections across the board for both state and federal offices.
POTUS drained the swamp on November 3rd (Pence referenced this on November 2nd as well), now we need to clean out the swamp creatures that remain.
Really?
I saw with my own eyes on video captures Biden votes jump by an exact number as Trump votes dropped by the exact same number. It is not as if such was the single such case. That's easily corrected.
And if Sidney Powell and others are correct about fractional votes and pre-loading of machines, that's easily corrected.
Do you have evidence they are wrong?
Do you have evidence that hand count of physical ballots -- my goodness, imagine doing that! -- would leave dispute as to whether Trump won?
You think the Trump landslide was too small to prove who actually won?
Why?
You saying that 75 million-plus actual Trump votes vs perhaps 60-something million actual Biden votes as a guess are "beyond redemption" is you.
I note you couldn't name the law or precedent for holding a replacement election once fraud is proven the sole cause of a person having been falsely put into office..
What? No. Not saying that at all. You misunderstood me.
Im just saying that because crooked election officials in some states have destroyed paper ballots and/or wiped the voting records on the machined, it makes it really difficult to PROVE to the sheep how big the landslide really was. I think Trump won by 410 electoral votes. And maybe the mil can actually prove that. I don't know yet. If they can show undeniable proof, then Trump is declared rightful winner. Done.
But we will still need new elections in any case if the majority of congress is arrested for treason.
My point was we all know Trump won. Bigly. But we wont be able to move fwd in unity until everyone can see a FAIR and transparent election.