Is this one of the actors from CNN?
(nationalfile.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
No, but one of [THEIR] paid agent provocateurs, yes. And the crowd knew it. She's a Q follower, as I'm sure a lot of those watching her speak are, too. They knew what the deal was.
It's becoming quite clear that [those] that refer tonus as "QAnon supporters" are the actual "QAnon" provocateurs. [They] are QAnon, essentially, because WE ALL know there's Q, there's Anons, but there's no "QAnon," except those that the MSM names as such.
For any newbies, lurking Normies, AND ESPECIALLY any Clowns or MSM reading these posts, do you understand what were saying here? Truly understand? There's Q, there's Anons, but there's NO "QANON!" That is [YOUR] creation, not ours. We see you asshats, we know what you are, and we will deal with you when the time comes. Fucking scared little bitch ass suckas, the LOT of [you].
Can somebody explain this "theres no qanon" thing to me? We don't know who or what is behind q definitively so therefore they are another anon on the boards. Sure they don't sign off as qanon, but it seems like a pedantic way to defend ourselves from msm attacks.
because they conflate q with the anons. while we anons are somewhat important in the sense that we are like a crowd-sourced decoder ring, an actual journalist would look at q posts as primary and other anons as mostly unimportant.
the media ignores all of the q posts that are indicative of insider info at the highest level, and instead focuses on some of the more “out there” posts from random anons, usually re:satanism, cannibalism, trump being anointed by god, etc.
It would have been more apt to call the whole Qanon as Anon known as Q.