On George this morning. A reminder to us? Or is this different?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
they are telling everyone to QUIT DATE FAGING
Indeed. One of the posts last fall I think was similar "stop going in crazy directions and focus on the fight at hand." (Paraphrasing) As in do what you can at your local level, inform people. Speak up and speak out.
Unless the whole thing is a demoralizarion campaign of epic proportions...military is doing what it needs to do under cover. We may never see all of it, because otherwise enemies will too.
Overdoing wild speculation right now is giving media/enemies ammunition to paint the movement as crazy and therefore dangerous. Then they can false flag again amd blame 'the movement' and further paint everyone as cultish terrorists in waiting
agreed
Nobody.
Nobody can stop
what's comingme from date fagging.Not when Q said "dates are important."
And not when overanalyzing is what I was BORN to DO!!!!!
Kek.
...
Spez: On a serious note, I'm not really a date fag because I don't think Q would give us (and by proxy, the deep state) the actual dates of important shit going down. Maybe just some hints or a very loose & general timespan at best (i.e. sometime within the next 3 years), along with a lot of red herrings to throw us off. But it is still fun to speculate & gives me something better to do while waiting to move out of this god-forsaken state.
Spez 2: Actually, I suspect this is George/Q warning people to not make March 4 the end-all be-all. Some people have been investing everything into that date & are all do-or-
diedoom about it, which I think is idealistically illogical (Would be nice if it all went kaboom & the good guys win definitively in a fantasy-novel-like defeat, but unlikely). I think Q purposely led us there & to that conclusion, but I actually think March 4 is a red herring meant to lure the deep state into making stupid moves that will very quickly come back to bite them in the ass, further loosening their grip & potentially forcing a very critical mistake. Notice that list of potential false flags planned for tomorrow? How'd that first insurrection work on Jan. 6th for Nancy? Literally boomeranged on calling up witnesses the moment she was listed. She's in some deep legal doo-doo now...Just pay attention & prepare for the massive influx of dills & shoomers that I have little-to-no doubt will arrive tomorrow.
It's been said before however, now they're admitting they are pushing anons towards JFK Jr.
They did not say JFK Jr. Quit making stuff up.
It's called speculation. Why else would they say "*guiding you toward a specific topic or person, well that's completely different ?"?
Because they could be guiding us to hundreds of other topics/people besides JFK Jr.