Went through a lot of responses to her nomination. It appears Dr. Erica Schwartz is VERY pro-vax mandate, pushed all vax's while in Coast Guard, and also said mRNA tech is 'safe and effective' (while laughing). Then was making lots of money at United Health care as an exec.
So - she is very qualified to push the big pharma agenda.
Yeah he maybe was a 'when does a bird sing' situation, and Trump has been boosting him for years - inexplicably.
Odds are he was playing a role after being turned, but he sure backstabbed Trump and his agenda a lot over the years.
Jimmy Dore covered a lot of her videos, and was a lot shorter than trying to watch 60-90 min videos. There was a boatload of details. I am not going to go back and try to summarize months worth of them. For like 6 months the only people saying the story was as presented by the 'trustworthy' FBI were normies and media shills. The fact that there is anyone now denying all those details that nothing added up what they were trying to paint as the story, simply because Candace turned on Trump (again) is kind of depressing.
Alex Jones had a lot of good info too, but was also twisting things to keep people away from certain facts, or countries...it doesnt kake everything he said invalid - just has to be looked at critcially.
"This is a historic step for commercial nuclear power in space," said Peter Cabauy, CEO of City Labs. "BOHR demonstrates that safe, compact, and regulatory-approved nuclear power systems are ready for routine commercial deployment. This capability enables persistent, always-on payload operations that are not constrained by sunlight or battery life."
Advancing Space cababilites maybe? Or making already functioning tech publicly known etc.
Indeed. Every single aspect and detail of the case screams false flag. Not a single fact adds up to the 'official story'.
Owens might be controlled opposition - but they get that way by telling the truth part of the time, and then turning at key points (like turning on Trump and saying vote democrat etc).
Dismissing the very detailed facts she has presented simply because she is an asset is narrow minded. 'Discernment' doesnt mean tune out everything - it means listening to everything and deciding on the facts, not simply accepting or rejecting what someone says because of their influencer staus.
"If we cant stop it...tax it" Feinberg says its unstoppable...but hey we can tax it! So its good right? (because people living abroad will totally follow US tax law).
Or - end it instead, one way or another. Change the laws.
The movie has pacing issues, way too many 'people walking' scenes. One action scene was maybe a bit too gratuitous. The most unrealistic part was the media actually reporting on the issues - but the alternative would have been a narrator or something so whatever.
But the message, and tone are effing bang on. 20 out of 10 for being the absolute based movie of the decade. Spelling out the moral and cultural issues on point - and then doing the thing about it one half of the planet wishes would be done about it.
I was forgetting about the Syria thing as commented on below. That one seems a real mystery - backing a ISIS leader who then leading the group slaughtering every other group it seems, like Christians, and including the Kurds. (not super familiar with who is slaughtering who at any given moment over there however).
I can see the point ya.
And if all those millions of ukrainians really wanted to keep their home - they would not have fled, by the millions, instead of fighting - while letting the govt grift over 100 billion into their pockets.
East Ukraine was Russian. West Ukraine was/is Nazis. They have national holidays and statues to Nazi officer Stephan Bandera etc.
Hopefully he gets good enough lawyers to do something about this. With the entire UK system being satanic and corrupted, hopefully they dont react by adding some new law banning legal defense etc - which they would probably try because they hate Musk, and free speech, and justice so much.
This tik tok means nothing. Flashing a quick article that only says there in an anonymous letter, where he 'may have met someone' (while he was an actor only became president in 2019) means nothing legally. Then flashing another page that is simply some random online post ranting about 'why doesnt someone arrest this guy' is useless. Usually Illuminatibot is better, though I havent looked at his posts in a while.
Maybe there are small factions that do actual work for America.
Because to legitimately do what he is saying - the Interlligence networks, MI6, 'a certain middle east country', the Vatican etc will have to go down.
But certainly it will hopefully be a good start? Work up the chain so people can see the connections (clueless people).