"Appears to be authentic" according to whom? And even if it is genuine, it doesn't prove anything beyond that Trump likes the guy enough to give him an autograph.
Read the article, Fren. The Epoch Times is a first class publication. They're not putting forth photoshopped pictures in support of their stories. Jason Miller has not claimed his twatter was hacked. Good enough?
Of course it doesn't 'prove' anything. But, its sufficiently self evident that an autograph given on an article about a guy that claims you're still the president is beyond '... Trump likes the guy enough to give him an autograph.' Also, it doesn't have to be good enough for you; its good enough for me.
"Appears to be authentic" according to whom? And even if it is genuine, it doesn't prove anything beyond that Trump likes the guy enough to give him an autograph.
(Paywall-bypassing archive link.)
If Trump is ever going to reveal himself as the new president of the restored republic, he should get on with it.
Read the article, Fren. The Epoch Times is a first class publication. They're not putting forth photoshopped pictures in support of their stories. Jason Miller has not claimed his twatter was hacked. Good enough?
You completely ignored my second sentence, so no.
Trump being restored-president isn't real UNTIL Schrödinger's box is actually opened.
about time we find out if the cat is alive/ded
Of course it doesn't 'prove' anything. But, its sufficiently self evident that an autograph given on an article about a guy that claims you're still the president is beyond '... Trump likes the guy enough to give him an autograph.' Also, it doesn't have to be good enough for you; its good enough for me.