57
Shillhunting 101 ? These people are stupid!
posted ago by 2820928 ago by 2820928 +57 / -0

The Noob Shill

Hasn't even got their first paycheck from George Soros yet, spends first few days on the job with obvious posts which get them banned in 7-17 minutes.

Sample work: "NOTHING HAPPEN, HUH?", "HA -Qtardds!", "Err, but Trump lied about x, and CNN said y."

The "I'm new here" Shill

They've cashed their first paycheck and are trying really hard to earn their bonus, has learnt how to make their shill-symbolic (shillbolic?) name passable to most users, posts stay up until a shill hunter comes along - or stay up, heavily-downvoted.

Sample work: "Hey Folks, just wondering how come Q said to trust sessions when all the patriots at TDW said he's no-good?", "Commie Fag!" (projection), "Well, that doesn't seem true, here's a link showing this other - unrelated topic proves another unrelated topic." "Fuck You, Retard.", "You're a dumb idiot if you believe that", "Haahha you're in a cult", "TRANSHUNTER!", "When I see someone so wrong as you, I must "call them out" on it."

The "4 week account/Deep plant" Shill

They're really invested in StOppInG MiSiNfoRmAtIoN, have spent 20-50 hours by week 3 arguing with borderline (and at times outright) leftist terminology and talking points, and will go on for a week or so until getting caught - we all see them as a Retard, if not a Shill.

Sample Work: "I'm more of a Q guy than an anti-vaccine guy", "I don't know - it doesn't seem like anything's going to happen", "what do I do now, Q failed me :(", "I got my first shot a week ago, feeling fine, happy to answer any questions about it., "Hollywood actors are disappearing?", "That looks like the real HRC lol - possible you're seeing differently because you want it to be a fake?", "Michele is not a man, this is the type of thing that the News uses against us", "(I'm more of a Q guy, not an anti-vaccine guy, just for the record -- not sure how much of a pariah that makes me, but there it is)".

In all seriousness though, don't allow yourself to be convinced by someone with only controversial comments, comments going against a clear statement from Q, supporter of libtard beliefs, low, low upvotes (0-500) and 40 day history (just to lose handshake), an account which only has comments placing doubt and disinfo (no contribution), an account with a name like "LeftLaneMustTurnLeft", "Krome891", "SurroundedInBlue".

When you engage with them and get back replies indicating they feel the need (job description) to fight MiSinForMatIoN, and starts going off with their MSM links, Wikipedia articles, etc... Regardless of if they're one of the (15-50k?) digital shills, they're not helping us. Not supporting Q and Great Awakening... Just rely on your own research, and to a limited-extent trust reputable anons in good faith (community). There are a lot of shills, but many of us - the good apples outnumber the bad by a LOT.