I read the article on their website AND they interpret the data “as showing the masks and closing restaurants as successfully slowing the spread” while admitting that the variance between with/without & open/closed was INSIGNIFICANT! Fricken spin while the data shows the truth! I sent the article with data to my brainwashed family who work with research data and couched it as helping but by a slight margin. I think once they see the data, they’ll recognize the discrepancy. Just trying to break through their programming- even if it’s slight.
I read the article on their website AND they interpret the data “as showing the masks and closing restaurants as successfully slowing the spread” while admitting that the variance between with/without & open/closed was INSIGNIFICANT! Fricken spin while the data shows the truth! I sent the article with data to my brainwashed family who work with research data and couched it as helping but by a slight margin. I think once they see the data, they’ll recognize the discrepancy. Just trying to break through their programming- even if it’s slight.