...and can you tell me whether I'm right or wrong? The whole Pence thing being a bad guy leaves big holes in the way I see things - for the plan to be going on perfectly well (for me, of course), Pence needs to be a good guy.

So, the reason why we've decided to posit that Pence is a traitor is the following:

• He certified the electoral college votes on January the 6th.

Yet, when we look at the way things are now, we realise and admit that the election had to be stolen and the fake President inaugurated in order for the fraud to be complete, for people to grasp the extent of their corruption. Finally, it was also important in order to secure future elections.

But, what if Pence had indeed refused to certify the votes? There would have been a commission to investigate the votes, and the state legislatures might have decertified their votes, and Trump inaugurated. So, we wouldn't be at where we are now, and it seems to me that everyone here agrees that this is the Greatawakening, and that people needed to see the corruption first hand.

Also, Trump insisted on saying that the most courageous thing for Pence to do would be to do nothing? He mentioned it two times:

"All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become president, and you are the happiest people. I just spoke to Mike. I said, ‘Mike, that doesn’t take courage. What takes courage is to do nothing. That takes courage,’ and then we’re stuck with a president who lost the election by a lot, and we have to live with that for four more years."

Let's think about it: did Mike Pence do nothing? Yes. Isn't that what Trump asked him to do?

Now, I know that the reason we're convinced Pence is a traitor is because Lin Wood has accused him of being a pedophile. I remember that in a tweet, he even accused Mike Pence of killing 58 children. I, for one, believe Lin Wood is on Trump's side. So, how do I interpret these accusations?

Q-post 3598 https://qalerts.app/?n=3598 says the following:

https://twitter.com/stormypatriot21/status/1195416791431995392

"Whistle Blower Traps"

[Mar 4 2018]

'Trap' keyword select provided…..

Whole or (parts) - break/break

You have more than you know.

Future proves past.

Q

Why wouldn't this whistle blower trap be one set for the DS, to make it seem as if the narrative was frail, fragile, and that the information Lin Wood has is not credible (because, if you follow my theory, Pence is not one of them)?

You don't access this post by typing in Whistle Blower (as it's in two words) but "traps". Now, this was posted on November the 15th, 2019, and Lin Wood started making accusations regarding Roberts - and later Pence - at around the same time period a year later. Lin Wood himself does not say he has evidence that Pence has done what the whistleblower has purported he has done. Lin Wood says there should be an investigation, and the only "proof" he has of it is that his whistleblower is credible.

Also, who followed Lin Wood before November the 3rd? Why was he put to the forefront? Remember how Sidney Powell and himself were supposed to be part of Trump's team, then we all started following them, only to be removed afterwards? I've always thought that the aim of putting them on the Trump team in the first place was to get people to listen to what they said, and to follow them. In this sense, Lin Wood served a purpose. Notice also how Trump never mentions him.

Interestingly, Pence published an article in TheDailySignal a few days ago (https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/03/03/election-integrity-is-a-national-imperative/) where he put forward election fraud, and clearly states that changes regarding elections have to be made via the legislatures (Under the Constitution, elections are governed at the state level. And each state is required to appoint presidential electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.”). What's the purpose of his doing this now? Why would he come forward with such information, knowing full well that Trump supporters have turned their back on him? It only makes him appear as a hypocrite, and now that Trump is vetting people, clearly, it'll only take one word from him for us to be fixed forever. I think that this revelation from Pence, if one might call it so, will become handy in the future.

Also, these past days, MSM has been pushing the narrative that Trump is going to be doing identity politics and is wondering whether he's going to be choosing a woman or a Black woman as VP. Apart from the fact that this is not Trump's way of doing things, the Epoch Times published an article yesterday (https://archive.is/Et1ZH), where a former Trump advisor, Miller, said that Trump had not ruled out having Pence as VP on a 2024 ticket. Why would this come out now?

In addition to all of this, we have to remember that Miller thanked Pence for the "most complex military operation" carried out in US history.

I know some of you are going to mention the elbow bumping with Nancy Pelosi or the coin. What if all of that was only part of the scenario? It seems difficult for me to imagine that Trump would have achieved so much without Pence's help during his presidency, and for all of the above reasons, I believe that Pence is a white hat.

Please feel free to poke holes in the theory, that's all I'm asking.