@Evspra - Are people posting links to GeorgeNews against the rules? I don't, and I'm sure most others would agree, need someone filtering content for me (content as it relates to analysis and discussion of GeorgeNews posts).
If GeorgeNews doesn't provide any type of equity it will naturally remove itself from the discussion on GAW.
My two cents:
Why I've never heard of GeorgeNews from the top trusted sources: Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, General Flynn and so on? And from the former George Magazine staff? And Q always encourages us to be suspicious of everything and everybody.
On the other hand, who's behind GeorgeNews is pretty good in the "4th dimension empathy thing" on the presentation of media (that's why so many trust them). Other thing. Even controlled sauces could mix some bits of truth (just because it works better this way). So nothing against keep processing data from many sides and then use logic, instinct and discernment to separate the accurate from the inaccurate. And, of course, never giving them money. Another thing: when we watch a chess game, the fun part for the non-players is to be able to see the moves from BOTH SIDES ;-)
In a nutshell, the obvious: anyone is free to censor or to keep following X or Y.