Dividshub.net is where my images were sent by public affairs when I was a combat camera soldier. I believe they are housed in the pentagon and its purpose is to store and release to the media/public if it was not classified material. Which the classified material was supposedly stored for archival purposes. We were encouraged to have our media uploaded there and to have lots of downloads, meant it was good. All of the military combat camera (each service has one), white house communications agency and public affairs units submit imagery to them. Not sure if its good or bad George is using them
"Dividshub.net is where my images were sent by public affairs when I was a combat camera soldier."
A lot of people are going to look very dumb and shrink into corners if Divid is contacted and their answer comes back in the form of, "Yeah, we got those from George. They're embedded, donchya know?"
--There's really only two ways this can go, and that's one of them.
I 100 percent was com cam. I don't know much about George news other than it's references from here and X-22. I can start checking it out and give an opinion. I know the images summited to dividshub are authentic in that they are taken by the military. A bias or spin may be placed on the imagery how they are captioned by George and when they are released. Add* Public affairs being the releasing authority may have an agenda also the releasing authority of dividshub could too. I guess I can at the moment really attest is that as the documentarian my goal was to get as many well composed and meaningful images but even I place a bias in what and when I chose to start capturing media.
Dividshub.net is where my images were sent by public affairs when I was a combat camera soldier. I believe they are housed in the pentagon and its purpose is to store and release to the media/public if it was not classified material. Which the classified material was supposedly stored for archival purposes. We were encouraged to have our media uploaded there and to have lots of downloads, meant it was good. All of the military combat camera (each service has one), white house communications agency and public affairs units submit imagery to them. Not sure if its good or bad George is using them
"Dividshub.net is where my images were sent by public affairs when I was a combat camera soldier."
A lot of people are going to look very dumb and shrink into corners if Divid is contacted and their answer comes back in the form of, "Yeah, we got those from George. They're embedded, donchya know?"
--There's really only two ways this can go, and that's one of them.
Flip your coins.
I 100 percent was com cam. I don't know much about George news other than it's references from here and X-22. I can start checking it out and give an opinion. I know the images summited to dividshub are authentic in that they are taken by the military. A bias or spin may be placed on the imagery how they are captioned by George and when they are released. Add* Public affairs being the releasing authority may have an agenda also the releasing authority of dividshub could too. I guess I can at the moment really attest is that as the documentarian my goal was to get as many well composed and meaningful images but even I place a bias in what and when I chose to start capturing media.