But seriously, this (along with planned 9/11 and fake landing on the moon) makes me re-think about EVERY milestone/event/disaster etc that has ever happened in the world. About the majority of things I have l and other have learned in history books. How is the truth hidden for so long?
people think the stuff government and media tells us is "mostly basically true but with maybe just a small amount of frauds or mistakes" the same way they think their hot dogs are "mostly basically actual meat but with maybe just a small amount of rat poop and bug parts"
but the rat poop and bug parts took over everything when they weren't looking and no one wants to deal with it
I'm all for shitting on stupid, bogus conspiracy theories. Such as Flat Earth.
But the official story for 9/11 is absolutely false beyond a shadow of a doubt, and it really does point to a controlled demolition (Yes, the planes hit the towers too.) Give this a read.
Also, the moon landing never happened. The link here is one of the funniest reads you'll ever have, check it out - Read this
Some bad peeps took advantage of 9-11 to do some bad shit. Controlled demo doesn’t make sense.
Not because the bad actors wouldn’t do it, but bc of the complexity described above
The official narrative regarding how the buildings fell makes a lot of sense.
Jet fuel heats up floor joist steel. Steel expands under heat. Expanded floors put a lot of pressure on joints that transfer the load to the vertical supports. Central joints fail. Remaining joints cannot handle load. Floor falls onto floor below.
All of the other stuff going on on 911 is fishy as hell. Buildings falling seams like an unplanned expense.
Okay then, if there's no proof for a controlled demo - explain building 7? How did it come down when no plane hit it? It collapsed at free fall speed into it's own footprint.
In that case what is your theory on what happened?
I haven't looked back at 9/11 for a long time, I just recall people claiming thermite dust was found as well as photos/witness accounts of molten steel at the foundation. The pancake theory pushed by mainstream never seemed plausible to me either.
If not a controlled demo then how were the towers brought down because I don't buy the NIST report and Building 7 still makes no sense to me.
But seriously, this (along with planned 9/11 and fake landing on the moon) makes me re-think about EVERY milestone/event/disaster etc that has ever happened in the world. About the majority of things I have l and other have learned in history books. How is the truth hidden for so long?
people think the stuff government and media tells us is "mostly basically true but with maybe just a small amount of frauds or mistakes" the same way they think their hot dogs are "mostly basically actual meat but with maybe just a small amount of rat poop and bug parts"
but the rat poop and bug parts took over everything when they weren't looking and no one wants to deal with it
Now you're catching on. If they hype it, it's fake.
Makes me reconsider dinosaurs.
I'm all for shitting on stupid, bogus conspiracy theories. Such as Flat Earth.
But the official story for 9/11 is absolutely false beyond a shadow of a doubt, and it really does point to a controlled demolition (Yes, the planes hit the towers too.) Give this a read.
Also, the moon landing never happened. The link here is one of the funniest reads you'll ever have, check it out - Read this
5 news agencies had the same angle. but half of them didnt have plane approaching. yeah in one angle you see a tomahawk missle.
That is well reasoned 45willwinagain.
Some bad peeps took advantage of 9-11 to do some bad shit. Controlled demo doesn’t make sense. Not because the bad actors wouldn’t do it, but bc of the complexity described above
The official narrative regarding how the buildings fell makes a lot of sense.
Jet fuel heats up floor joist steel. Steel expands under heat. Expanded floors put a lot of pressure on joints that transfer the load to the vertical supports. Central joints fail. Remaining joints cannot handle load. Floor falls onto floor below.
All of the other stuff going on on 911 is fishy as hell. Buildings falling seams like an unplanned expense.
trump thinks otherwise
Okay then, if there's no proof for a controlled demo - explain building 7? How did it come down when no plane hit it? It collapsed at free fall speed into it's own footprint.
9/11 was definitely a controlled demolition. Building 7! Remember building 7???
Forget about building 7. Just the the way Towers fell looked like an implosion.
Building 7 is the proof. Never hit by a plane and fell into a neat little pile.
In that case what is your theory on what happened?
I haven't looked back at 9/11 for a long time, I just recall people claiming thermite dust was found as well as photos/witness accounts of molten steel at the foundation. The pancake theory pushed by mainstream never seemed plausible to me either.
If not a controlled demo then how were the towers brought down because I don't buy the NIST report and Building 7 still makes no sense to me.
Well, you are the genius. So you do you, brother.