I'm surprised at the quick 180 most people have done on here. I used to get criticized for suggesting maybe George really hasn't done much to prove they're legit.
We need to be thinking critically; not being emotionally invested in the outcome of whether or not George is legit.
Bear in mind, any of the major players could have endorsed George if it was legit. If they're really hanging out with Trump at Mar-A-Lago, one of the major players could have taken 15 seconds out of their day to tweet support for George. If George is supposed to be presenting itself as a legit news source, what would be the problem? Why would they not endorse it?
I'm surprised at the quick 180 most people have done on here. I used to get criticized for suggesting maybe George really hasn't done much to prove they're legit.
We need to be thinking critically; not being emotionally invested in the outcome of whether or not George is legit.
Bear in mind, any of the major players could have endorsed George if it was legit. If they're really hanging out with Trump at Mar-A-Lago, one of the major players could have taken 15 seconds out of their day to tweet support for George. If George is supposed to be presenting itself as a legit news source, what would be the problem? Why would they not endorse it?