We've had our Simon Parks; we've had our George News; we've had our Newsmax; we've had our Parler.
All of these were trusted (by many) in the beginning. All of these have been exposed.
It's time people start promoting more skepticism. Just because you want to hear something, doesn't mean it's true.
I know I've seen enough proofs to take Q seriously, at the least. Q said "No outside comms". People are (frankly childishly) pissing that repeated guidance into the wind repeatedly in favor of some cheap hope.
We need to stop promoting ANYONE but Q, without extensive, rigorous, and conclusive proofs.
The new rule should be this: fake until proven true.
Assume images are fake; assume videos are fake; assume it's ALL fake. Build off of what you know isn't. Force those claiming to have information to verify their information.
Being gullible isn't just a "oh well I'm disappointed" problem; it's damaging our cause astronomically. What happens when some freakjob gets the idea to shill us out and then brag about it in the next CNN documentary?
We don't all have to agree on our research. That said, we should attempt to come to some kind of logic and evidence driven consensus before trusting and promoting sources. These consensus proofs should be compiled into an easily distributable "proof" which can be supplied whenever anyone else reacts with skepticism.
We're better than this. Let's start proving it.
Well stated...I agree that so much is fake these days it is Wise to be skeptical of everything in bizarro world out there....how do you propose to accomplish this? This is a safe space for all of us and we need to make sure to keep it to the standards all those who paved the way deserve to have preserved...
Blessings!
Just be skeptical. It's okay to make guesses/assumptions or to be hopeful of certain things, but people here will adopt assumptions and hold them as ABSOLUTE truth. Be open to the idea that something/someone can be bullshit. If someone "decodes" a current event, look at it objectively. Not every single thing introduced/proposed here is going to be a slam dunk. Not every single person who claims to be or have an inside source is telling the truth. In fact, most of them are bullshitting. We all want reasons to keep having faith this will work out, but what good is disregarding your standards and believing something just because it sounds good, only for you to be horribly disappointed in the end? Just be skeptical unless you are provided at least some solid evidence. Even then, keep an open mind that it could still end up being BS.