It's really bizarre that one mod speaheaded this whole thing.
I hardly ever see any of the mods on here commenting etc...
The whole thing is ridiculous. IF George were out there claiming to be Q and trying to tell people to research their drops etc... I would have been all for exposure. But exposing people who have been cheerleading and referencing Q like many others, just doesn't make sense.
I think she was offended that they sell merch. She banned them for being "PAYtriots." There's alot of them -- Alex Jones and Mike Adams among the most blatant. But for some reason George was suddenly deemed nefarious. I just don't get it.
Oh I forgot to add they also banned people for asking about why they were using videos/photos from another site without posting credit.
Most of the people asking about it were instantly banned on their telegram, and their comment sections have been closed due to "bots"
Something stinks with GN...... But I believe in letting everyone reach their own conclusions and do their own research, so I understand if people reach a different conclusion than me, and there are still lots of questions that need answers.
They were also passing off videos/pictures as their own, but they were really taken by someone else. Which I agree is VERY suspicious because the main way George tries to prove their legitimacy is by telling people to look at their photos and videos and that that is all the proof they need.
This in combination with some stuff George said in the last livestream I participated in really rubbed be the wrong way and made me highly doubt their legitimacy. Now, I do think a link ban may have been a little premature and heavy handed. I think if Evspra posted their findings and opened it up to all of us to research, that would have gone over much better.
So I do see both sides, but I am extremely skeptical of George News now based on several things Evspra brought up and my own research.
Yeah, but someone also posted a thread about contacting the original source of the vids. Apparently, they were very uncooperative . . . It seemed like George was getting their vids from them LEGALLY as in nothingburger.
It is a little troubling that they would pass off videos as theirs if in fact they weren't. BUT IMO that's hardly worth the nuclear drama of the last two days.
I agree completely. I think people on BOTH sides needed to take a chill pill and make it a board effort to get to the bottom of things without overreacting on both sides.
It's really bizarre that one mod speaheaded this whole thing.
I hardly ever see any of the mods on here commenting etc...
The whole thing is ridiculous. IF George were out there claiming to be Q and trying to tell people to research their drops etc... I would have been all for exposure. But exposing people who have been cheerleading and referencing Q like many others, just doesn't make sense.
I think she was offended that they sell merch. She banned them for being "PAYtriots." There's alot of them -- Alex Jones and Mike Adams among the most blatant. But for some reason George was suddenly deemed nefarious. I just don't get it.
Oh I forgot to add they also banned people for asking about why they were using videos/photos from another site without posting credit.
Most of the people asking about it were instantly banned on their telegram, and their comment sections have been closed due to "bots"
Something stinks with GN...... But I believe in letting everyone reach their own conclusions and do their own research, so I understand if people reach a different conclusion than me, and there are still lots of questions that need answers.
They were also passing off videos/pictures as their own, but they were really taken by someone else. Which I agree is VERY suspicious because the main way George tries to prove their legitimacy is by telling people to look at their photos and videos and that that is all the proof they need.
This in combination with some stuff George said in the last livestream I participated in really rubbed be the wrong way and made me highly doubt their legitimacy. Now, I do think a link ban may have been a little premature and heavy handed. I think if Evspra posted their findings and opened it up to all of us to research, that would have gone over much better.
So I do see both sides, but I am extremely skeptical of George News now based on several things Evspra brought up and my own research.
Yeah, but someone also posted a thread about contacting the original source of the vids. Apparently, they were very uncooperative . . . It seemed like George was getting their vids from them LEGALLY as in nothingburger.
It is a little troubling that they would pass off videos as theirs if in fact they weren't. BUT IMO that's hardly worth the nuclear drama of the last two days.
Vids?
I think the whole thing could have been handled better.
I agree completely. I think people on BOTH sides needed to take a chill pill and make it a board effort to get to the bottom of things without overreacting on both sides.