I remember when the Q line was created in 1991, when the arpanet become the internet, this was right after the fall of the soviet union and the globalists started taking over the networks:
https://www.erisnet.org/erisnet_pressrelease.pdf
Now that huge amounts of sumerian cuneiform (who gave the alphabet to most of the middle east) have been translated, it appears Genesis, in any canon other than the Latin Vulgate, was wrong with Ninurta/Nimrod:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninurta
We know during the dark ages, there was many correctors of the canon, but they made a lot of mistakes. Was it Jerome? St Augustine, who wrote City of God, always criticized him for using so many Hebrew texts when he rewrote the canon (the vulgate was closer to what the zoroastrian texts but the romans and sasanid empire were basically in a 400 year war). The dead dead scrolls revealed a lot of truths.
Keep in mind that a LOT of text was recovered from that era, and even before that era, it wasn't until computers could do rosetta stone-like translation that a lot of the more ancient papyrus could be extracted. A lot of it is partially congruent with either the Talmud or the Old Testament (who knows what the explanation is but there were probably many sects who each passed on different cannons). Also, the Vatican has a lot of text digitized now (they hoarded it forever) that isn't in line with the Council of Trent's canon.
Which of the red pills?
I remember when the Q line was created in 1991, when the arpanet become the internet, this was right after the fall of the soviet union and the globalists started taking over the networks: https://www.erisnet.org/erisnet_pressrelease.pdf
Then the world's information banks started exponential growth due to infinite digitization: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Hilbert_InfoGrowth.png
Now that huge amounts of sumerian cuneiform (who gave the alphabet to most of the middle east) have been translated, it appears Genesis, in any canon other than the Latin Vulgate, was wrong with Ninurta/Nimrod: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninurta
We know during the dark ages, there was many correctors of the canon, but they made a lot of mistakes. Was it Jerome? St Augustine, who wrote City of God, always criticized him for using so many Hebrew texts when he rewrote the canon (the vulgate was closer to what the zoroastrian texts but the romans and sasanid empire were basically in a 400 year war). The dead dead scrolls revealed a lot of truths.
The Dead Sea Scrolls proved the Old Testament was preserved intact since before the birth of Christ.
Keep in mind that a LOT of text was recovered from that era, and even before that era, it wasn't until computers could do rosetta stone-like translation that a lot of the more ancient papyrus could be extracted. A lot of it is partially congruent with either the Talmud or the Old Testament (who knows what the explanation is but there were probably many sects who each passed on different cannons). Also, the Vatican has a lot of text digitized now (they hoarded it forever) that isn't in line with the Council of Trent's canon.
See the advanced books here: http://www.gnosis.org/library/dss/dss_bookstore.htm
I think a lot of Hebrew and Zoroastrian (the pre-Islamic religion of mesopotamia and persia) cannon mixed especially near Cestiphon because of the Romans, Sassans and Greek influences: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoroastrianism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandria_Eschate
In modern times (the last 20 years), a lot more text has been recovered from places far flung like Ethiopia, India, and even China.