Last I knew all links to unverified telegrams claiming to have insider status are banned. George got found out, denied any proof, didn't address accusations so they got added to the list. Keep trying to act like its a big deal, legit any discussion is still being had, LINKS TO THEIR FUCKING telegram are banned.
You misunderstand what I'm addressing. The issue is freedom of speech. George News is the catalyst. Freedom of speech requires that one be able to express their ideas and others are able to reject it. I have stated many times that I am 100% NOT standing on the side of George News, but I'm finding it increasingly ironic that many on this forum, which advocates a Great Awakening, are bringing in the tactics of Twatter to close down debate.
In all honesty, if you get away from GA and go to a site like social.quodVerum, you will see the hypocrisy that is rampant here at GA. Intellectually, and apart of the Q boards, they have arrived at what is actually happening in America: devolution. They've shown the evidence. They have arrived at what I consider a very real conclusion. No need to debate it, but the debate is still open for debate there. Many on this board tear down people on social.QuodVerum because of their failure to embrace Q. They cry "shill" at the mention of Thomas Wictor. I find that his analysis backs us Q, but oh no, we can't have anyone arrive at the same conclusion without Q in the picture. No, siree.
But on forums like social.QuodVerum they don't suppress the freedom of speech. They opine and debate. Great Awakening is not a site to opine and debate unless you're all full of "hopium" (can't have anyone express a concern because that's dooming). You can't opine or debate unless you read the boards and have the same conclusion, and the conclusion of at least two moderators is that George News is not Q, therefore, there is no value. God forbid someone go to George News simply to look at pictures. I do agree that trying to link George News to Q is probably a waste of time, but if someone wants to do it, let them. That's called freedom of speech. I've asked a question three times already and apparently no one has been able to answer it. It has been ignored. I'm not asking it again, but I think one conclusion I can come to about the subject is that people are afraid to address the issue because moderators will circle and pick at their carcasses.
I think we sometimes forget that not everything is about Q. Some things just are. But if someone goes to George News OR to Pompeo or to Scavino, it's their prerogative. Here, I'll just say it: If Q said no outside comms, no one needs to be running to Pompeo and Scavino, et al, tweets either. Those our outside comms, but where is the "hopium" in that. Don't bring it up on this forum where suppression of freedom of speech is the norm.
Last I knew all links to unverified telegrams claiming to have insider status are banned. George got found out, denied any proof, didn't address accusations so they got added to the list. Keep trying to act like its a big deal, legit any discussion is still being had, LINKS TO THEIR FUCKING telegram are banned.
You misunderstand what I'm addressing. The issue is freedom of speech. George News is the catalyst. Freedom of speech requires that one be able to express their ideas and others are able to reject it. I have stated many times that I am 100% NOT standing on the side of George News, but I'm finding it increasingly ironic that many on this forum, which advocates a Great Awakening, are bringing in the tactics of Twatter to close down debate.
In all honesty, if you get away from GA and go to a site like social.quodVerum, you will see the hypocrisy that is rampant here at GA. Intellectually, and apart of the Q boards, they have arrived at what is actually happening in America: devolution. They've shown the evidence. They have arrived at what I consider a very real conclusion. No need to debate it, but the debate is still open for debate there. Many on this board tear down people on social.QuodVerum because of their failure to embrace Q. They cry "shill" at the mention of Thomas Wictor. I find that his analysis backs us Q, but oh no, we can't have anyone arrive at the same conclusion without Q in the picture. No, siree.
But on forums like social.QuodVerum they don't suppress the freedom of speech. They opine and debate. Great Awakening is not a site to opine and debate unless you're all full of "hopium" (can't have anyone express a concern because that's dooming). You can't opine or debate unless you read the boards and have the same conclusion, and the conclusion of at least two moderators is that George News is not Q, therefore, there is no value. God forbid someone go to George News simply to look at pictures. I do agree that trying to link George News to Q is probably a waste of time, but if someone wants to do it, let them. That's called freedom of speech. I've asked a question three times already and apparently no one has been able to answer it. It has been ignored. I'm not asking it again, but I think one conclusion I can come to about the subject is that people are afraid to address the issue because moderators will circle and pick at their carcasses.
I think we sometimes forget that not everything is about Q. Some things just are. But if someone goes to George News OR to Pompeo or to Scavino, it's their prerogative. Here, I'll just say it: If Q said no outside comms, no one needs to be running to Pompeo and Scavino, et al, tweets either. Those our outside comms, but where is the "hopium" in that. Don't bring it up on this forum where suppression of freedom of speech is the norm.