I've got a good friend that is strongly considering getting the jab. They're a Trump supporter but very out of the loop (they know the steal, but still buy the virus stuff). I had a passionate argument with them to convince them to avoid the jab. I referenced a lot of the stuff I've seen for a while about how it's dangerous AF; especially the CDC statistics and such.
They're rational, and want to see the data firsthand. I will gather what I have saved, but I would be extremely grateful if some of you fellow patriots could help me out finding some of the studies, data, and expert analysis.
The only kinds of sources this individual would accept would likely be direct data, the literal studies, and writings from actual medical officials. If there were mainstream sources that could be compiled to show the jab is bad, that would be acceptable as well. Random WordPress websites, no matter how well researched, will not go over well.
Some of the prominent points to back up:
- Covid is virtually completely harmless unless you are extremely unhealthy or fairly old.
- The MRNA vaccine permanently alters DNA.
- The MRNA has a high potential to cause sterilization.
- The statistical likelihood of death to corona is lower than the statistical likelihood of a severe negative reaction to the vaccine.
- The vaccine has not demonstrated any improvements with regards to the body's response to coronavirus (it is useless).
- Officials have admitted pre-Trump testing was hogwash and over-reported cases (10x the number of cases[?])
Any sources I find will be added in the comments, as well.
Thank you, and God bless you!
Ask them this.
The survival rate of CONvid is 99.8%.
Supposedly, half a million Americans have 'died' because of CONvid.
Extrapolate half a million 'deaths' to the total infections.
You get a figure roughly approximating twenty and a half million.
That means more than 3 out of 4 Americans have 'had IT'.
Ask your friend, has 3 out 4 people he knows 'had it'?
If he can't answer, then ditch the cunt.
Sadly statistics don't really work that way, but the gist is accurate and is what I talked to them about. What they're looking for is the direct sources; such as what you were saying about 99.8% survival rate and so on.
That said, I recall hearing the survival rate is actually way higher than 99.8.
Either way, what I'm looking for is sources more than arguments.
Thank you!
How about affidavits? I had the virus a year ago at age 69 and I didn't die. I had a week of mild "flu" and loss of taste but was otherwise fine.
They might help, we will see! Thanks for letting me know!
I have a few questions for you if you don't mind (literally just my curiosity)?
Have you ever had that same kind of lost of taste with other illnesses? I know I tend to lose taste to some extent even just from colds because of nasal congestion. Is this somehow unique from that?
Did you get fever and muscle soreness? I feel like I got corona or something extremely similar over a year before they started talking about it (it wasn't the flu and it lead to severe pneumonia).
There are 330 million Americans.
Your statistics are just... so far off.
20 is not 75% of 330