Seems Trump's break is finished
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (74)
sorted by:
I call foul on your source, but I appreciate the concept of devil's advocate.
Admittedly no source isn't better than a poor source, but my understanding was that blue was considered a color of protection (e.g. prominent in Israel) while pink was similar to skin color, and so associated with girls for encouraging or suggesting marital relations.
If we wanted a strong or bright color for boys, I'd have thought red or orange to be more easily available, long-used colors.
https://news.usc.edu/134061/pink-for-boys-and-blue-for-girls-the-colorful-history-of-things-designed-for-kids/
https://www.straightdope.com/21343917/was-pink-originally-the-color-for-boys-and-blue-for-girls
https://www.thevintagenews.com/2019/05/01/pink-blue/
https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/12/health/colorscope-pink-boy-girl-gender/index.html
https://forgottenhistoryblog.com/pink-wasnt-always-considered-a-feminine-color-and-blue-wasnt-always-masculine/
<mike drop>