I can´t believe this is real
(nationalfile.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (21)
sorted by:
I agree with your premise. What would you suggest we use instead? Something that quickly explains where you stand, and also who you are talking about?
We being us here. I don't fully understand and thus don't know how to address your question, but here are some thoughts. Please ask for clarification if you want or need it.
Left and Right are a real spectrum. The NWO is coming from the left. The left has usurped the concept of liberalism. Their ideas are far from liberal yet anyone who is on the left calls themselves liberal. This provides them protection because most modern people don't disagree with liberal ideas. We have to separate the left from liberalism. The modern left is not liberal. We shouldn't call them such.
RINO is a term i'm not sure about. Republican In Name Only implies that a real Republican is good. In my lifetime, a Republican has been a uni-party member. Lincoln seemed like a good dude. At what point in history do we draw the line? Is the Republican title something we should reclaim or should we just call RINOs Republicans? Trump seems set on reclaiming and I agree. Our population is pretty dumb. Brand recognition matters.
Since I'm talking about terminology, I'll give you one more: conspiracy theorist. This is a person who theorizes there is a plan to commit a crime. Culturally, a conspiracy theory has come to mean something that could never happen and is banana pants crazy. People use these terms in this way all the time on this site. If a conspiracy is uncovered, the populace is programmed to disbelieve it because conspiracies aren't real. My point is we need to be precise with our words. Reprogram people so that if they here about a conspiracy theory, they say 'given evidence i would believe it and thus the whole world would be shook up' vs 'no amount of evidence could convince me because conspiracy theories are false'