Nobody can be redpilled until they choose to open their mind. I think it's important that we present an opposing case so that people at least KNOW there's an opposing case. Even if they refuse to listen to it and want to call it BS without research. But at least they know there's other people out there who feel differently.
I thought universal healthcare was the most obvious "duh" policy of all time. Who could oppose it? I hated anybody that thought it was wrong. But ultimately I decided to do my research one day and humble my arrogance on the topic. If nobody questioned it, would I have ever even thought there was another side of the argument?
It makes me wonder if attackings peoples arrogance assuredness in their positions might be a potential avenue for redpilling them.
Nobody can be redpilled until they choose to open their mind. I think it's important that we present an opposing case so that people at least KNOW there's an opposing case. Even if they refuse to listen to it and want to call it BS without research. But at least they know there's other people out there who feel differently.
I thought universal healthcare was the most obvious "duh" policy of all time. Who could oppose it? I hated anybody that thought it was wrong. But ultimately I decided to do my research one day and humble my arrogance on the topic. If nobody questioned it, would I have ever even thought there was another side of the argument?
It makes me wonder if attackings peoples arrogance assuredness in their positions might be a potential avenue for redpilling them.