It is hidden in plain sight; he is Q. I just looked at all his prior posts across all platforms from 12/20/20 onward; it all makes so much sense now. Why Q stopped communicating to us, when that happened, and how Dan’s postings took a subtle shift. Scavino is Q, or he is the Q mouthpiece.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
I don't think Q is a singular person but rather a group of military intelligence people. Scavino is the inside man of the group. He's the one who takes pictures of the watch with reflections and other things close to the President. He may be the scribe of the group who does a lot of posting but he's not part of the intelligence team who formulated the "Plan". That began before Trump was even elected.
You should replace "I don't think Q is" with "Q is not a" at the start. When plainly stated that the group is less than 10 and 3 civilian. Less known, but an analysis of all Q posts was done using learning algorithms and determined that Q posts have 2 distinct "authors" (the article did not elaborate if one then another or mixed).
I would say it is a safe bet that scavino is one of the non-military on the team. Somehow I expect Assange to be as well, no evidence just gut.
YEAH DO HIS RESEARCH REAL GOOD AND THOROUGH LIKE!
do my research boy.
Scavino or kappy
Kappy? He ded
Now Kappy is Cohen. Keep up
I thought so too once but then I saw this Q post. Read the bottom. https://qalerts.app/?n=4527
If you knew the first thing about Logic, you would know that (a) it is up to the one making an assertion to prove his case; (b) it is NOT up to us hearing that assertion to prove anything; and (c) one cannot "prove" a negative. Checkmate.
If we know anything, it's that Q is NOT a person, but rather a team composed of less than 10 people, some of whom are military intelligence.
If that's the case, we're fucked.
But no. Sorta doesn't make any sense for it to be Dan.