Agreed. The decodes (esp. the ones I see on Telegram) seem to range from rock solid to iffy to Stretch Armstrong levels. I'm a noob so I'm still trying to navigate the drops and reconcile them with what's happening here and now.
At face value, Q's drops were meant for around the same time as they were posted. Was there anything else that implied they were to be used as reference post-2020 election? The only thing I could think of is "Future proves past", but was that for when Q was establishing credibility among anons? I'm just looking for reference as to how to approach random decodes that people may post. Everyday tweets seem to me easy pickings for confirmation bias if you're not careful. Can anyone weigh in?
Agreed. The decodes (esp. the ones I see on Telegram) seem to range from rock solid to iffy to Stretch Armstrong levels. I'm a noob so I'm still trying to navigate the drops and reconcile them with what's happening here and now.
At face value, Q's drops were meant for around the same time as they were posted. Was there anything else that implied they were to be used as reference post-2020 election? The only thing I could think of is "Future proves past", but was that for when Q was establishing credibility among anons? I'm just looking for reference as to how to approach random decodes that people may post. Everyday tweets seem to me easy pickings for confirmation bias if you're not careful. Can anyone weigh in?