Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
()
posted 5 years ago by patriotic_legend 5 years ago by patriotic_legend +44 / -0
39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 15 ▼
– Moonchild15 15 points 5 years ago +15 / -0

This absolutely has to be part of the movie. They can’t really be dropping pregnant women behind enemy lines? No. Just no. This has to be part of make the left do absolutely insane things to wake everyone up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– ThePrussianElefant90 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

i really hope so...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– FormerTanker19K 11 points 5 years ago +11 / -0

As an Army Veteran, I know pregnant soldiers were not allowed to deploy and I served under Hussein. Moonchild15 makes a good point that it has to be apart of the movie. Pregnant service women never deploy. Patriotic_legend the Space Force was born from the Air Force Space Command which means it could have compromised Air Force personnel in it's ranks. I don't know frens, whatever this means and what ever is going on, I pray it ends up in our graces.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– FormerTanker19K 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

No doubt. Information warfare is a mind fuck. Stay easy fren. WWG1WGA!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Trustnone 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

Yup. I deployed with 3rd Brigade 3rd Infantry Division out of Ft. Benning and fought alongside many tankers as their medic and I completely agree. We screened for pregnancy before deployment and if a female was pregnant they remained at home station with the rear detachment. If they got pregnant while on leave our even during the deployment they were sent home. No pregnant soldiers were allowed in theater and it's fucking stupid to say they are allowed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– FormerTanker19K 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Thank you brother. Medics embedded with front line units were God sends. You embedded with us and dealt with the same shit as us. Same goes for those in Infantry units. Or artillery. Thank you a thousand times over. And you're right. Pregnant females were not deployed. Theater is not a place for pregnant females.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

The issue is what we are not talking about.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Mbrat73 8 points 5 years ago +8 / -0

Maybe its purposeful to make dems think they are in control? I hate to think SF is compromised.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– SemperSupra 7 points 5 years ago +7 / -0

In the past it was always a problem with the navy and other armed forces. If a woman didn't want to be deployed she could get pregnant and get out easy. Pregnancy was a way to avoid a tour. In the past she would have been discharged for it, but not these days. Of course, pregnancy at a office job may not be such a problem. However, a woman deployed on a navy ship can't serve while pregnant. This causes many Navy ships to have too few members since whenever the woman wants out she can get knocked up and have an "oopsie" and she's sent back.

They also have to keep her as a member even while she can't serve. Women right's and all made sure of that. The Left suddenly cared about women being pregnant when it compromised our deployment capabilities.

I guarantee you none of them women who use the "pregnancy out" card will be happy to hear that they could be deployed to the battlefield while pregnant. I'm not sure the military would actually do this or if they're finally making the threat to crack down on this crap.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

You guys are being distracted from the real issue here. The fact that we’re talking about this, rather than bigger issues like China, is a problem.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Woah I’m not scolding anyone. Yes, I clicked here because it’s important, and it is related to something I posted here earlier today.

My past posts have nothing to do with this- it’s a completely different topic. Sounds like your trying to play that cancel culture game with me. So If that’s the game you play than we can just agree to disagree on content value. In the mean time, I’m allowed to give my input and like you said, you are allowed to think for yourself. Nobody is forcing you to do anything so please, calm he fuck down.

Im speaking my mind here. But the fact that you take my comments so personally, rather than discussing the substance, is on you, not me. You’d rather be upset- cool , but understand why you are feeling this way, instead of ‘scolding’ me.

And yes, you are right, we aren’t sheep, we can think and discuss freely. So what exactly is your issue here? That I spoke my mind and gave my opinion?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SemperSupra 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Oh I had already deleted my post before you responded. But if you want to still talk about it then sure. If it's that important to you.

You come to this post asking why people are talking about this topic and not China and bigger issues, yet you have posts where you're not talking about China and bigger issues. Nobody forced you to post here or reply to my comment. You went out of your way to make a big deal out of people talking about what they want to talk about. I don't get why. Just let people talk about what they consider important.

I'm speaking my mind too. What substance did you want to talk? Your post is literally "Why are you people talking about this when there is China?" And yet.. you have posts about... Hocus Pocus? Erm... hardly about China and the bigger issues.

I could tell from your previous comments and posts how you respond to disagreement so I deleted it because I was like "aw, this isn't a person interested in discussion", but if you want to keep talking about this that's fine.

My opinion is the same. You are not being cancelled. You can say what you want, but people can disagree. That is not being cancelled. That is just people saying, "I think your statement is 100% wrong".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Ok.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Also, I’m trying to help ppl see the real issue - that is China. Not some bs maternity flight suit. That’s mundane and absolutely irrelevant to real world problems. Wake up- do you’re research and then if you feel the same- go ahead and insult me and stalk my past posts.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SemperSupra 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Insult you? Stalk you? Wow, what are you talking about? Lots of people take a look at past posts. You don't always know if you're engaging with a shill. Glancing at their pasts posts can give an idea of what kind of person they are. Are they really here to have a discussion or play a victim or are they a shill? It's not an unusual thing.

I've not insulted you. I've simply said I disagree with you and you've become upset and blown up over nothing. It's kinda of confusing. I wish I had read your pasts posts more before replying. Once I did I was like "Woah, this isn't a person who wants to have a rational discussion" and I tried to delete.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Ok.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Ok my comment wasn’t meant to chastise you, it was just my interpretation based on the fact that you believe this is truly about pregnant women serving in the military.. in my comment, I’m saying it’s a ‘problem’ because I feel like it’s a distraction overall. That’s my general theory of the situation regarding the military’s priorities and Tucker pointed that out. I say ‘we’ as in, us all, myself included- I’m not talking about you personally. I feel like you think I’m trying to tell you talk about China and that’s not my intent. Does that make sense?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Completely understandable. Thanks for hearing me out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Hectorsalamanca 5 points 5 years ago +5 / -0

Everything is compromised

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– cynicalman 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Space Command and Space Force, I believe, are 2 very different orgs.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– FemalePatriot 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Does anyone have the links to both situations? I’m seeing a lot of hype from both sides and I would love to watch them so I can better make my own opinion of what actually happened.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Precocious13 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I have a telegram link to the midnight Rider channel, one of the tweets was forwarded to her feed, and like 80 people were commenting, so all the tweets ended up in the comments section of that post, if that makes sense, I can't figure out how to link that forwarded post to her channel, because you need to read the comments there to see them all, here's her channel. Midnight Rider Channel Karli Channel https://t.me/MidnightRiderChannel

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Spongebob1808 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

It always was...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Regardless of the underlying purpose, our enemies are all watching.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– kekmemes 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

the military is cucked. gotta protect the opium fields

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– scyenceFiction 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

I want to interject some background info here... the statement earlier this week was about maternity flight suits.

When I was in, I had friends on flight status- Army and AF, that were female. You were removed from flight status if you were pregnant, period. You weren't flying, nevermind deploying. One of my friends (Blackhawk pilot) was crushed when she found out she was preggo, dropped off flight status and pulled off of a deployment with her husband.

In that situation, pilots, crew chiefs, even ground crew authorized to wear the flight suit, had to return to wearing the standard services' maternity uniform. This was a gripe of theirs- somehow, in their mind, wearing a flight suit made them 'special', and evidence they had a higher status than the average grunt, cook, or cannon cocker.

I guarantee this whole row is over females feeling 'disrespected' by being forced to wear the same fucking uniform everyone else does, and the new wokeness in leadership positions wants to appease a bunch of commissioned crybabies. I'm also betting the company that makes flight suits for the services has a lobbying arm that put a bug in someone's ear... it's been a while since flight suits got redesigned, there's big money in that contract change order.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Tequilaflowers 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

But that’s not what was being criticized. The overall issue was the military prioritizing issues politically. All the while our enemies watch.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– scyenceFiction 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

100% agreement here. It's a return to the Barry Soetoro days where the military is being divided with social justice issues. The flight suit story is exhibit #1, in that some have taken it out of context (thinking it means we're deploying pregnant women) and those who defend it as a SJW womens' issue (like that Chief Master Sgt).

For us on the outside, I see it as eroding our confidence in the military, while attracting the weak-minded and those who would use military service as a dodge. I think this is part of a bigger plan to turn the military into a conscripted force willing to follow orders for a paycheck, after weeding out the hard men who would defend the constitution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy